首页> 外文会议>Photomask and next-generation lithography mask technology XVII >Defect inspection and repair performance comparisons between EUV and conventional masks
【24h】

Defect inspection and repair performance comparisons between EUV and conventional masks

机译:EUV与常规口罩之间的缺陷检查和维修性能比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Two types of blanks, EUV A and EUV B, are the leading EUV blanks contenders. They are evaluated and compared with OMOG blank for their suitability as a photomask blanks. For defect inspection evaluation, contrast for pattern image and sensitivity for detection were evaluated using the newly developed inspection tools. With these tools, it is learnt that the sensitivity varies according to a set of conditions. For repair performance evaluations, EUV mask was assessed through E-beam repair tools, those that are most widely used. The results on both types of masks demonstrate good repair shape that is almost same quality as repair on OMOG mask. Moreover, under the two types of repair conditions used in this study, no degradation on pattern was found for the optimized condition as result of repair work.
机译:两种类型的坯料,EUV A和EUV B,是领先的EUV坯料竞争者。对它们进行评估,并将其与OMOG空白作为光掩模空白的适用性进行比较。对于缺陷检查评估,使用新开发的检查工具评估了图案图像的对比度和检测灵敏度。通过这些工具,可以了解到灵敏度根据一组条件而变化。为了进行维修性能评估,通过使用最广泛的电子束维修工具对EUV面罩进行了评估。两种面罩的结果均显示出良好的修复形状,与OMOG面罩的修复质量几乎相同。此外,在本研究中使用的两种维修条件下,由于维修工作,未发现优化条件下图案的退化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号