首页> 外文会议>European Medical Biological Engineering Conference >Clinical Engineering Revisited: the Grip of Leadership-Part 2
【24h】

Clinical Engineering Revisited: the Grip of Leadership-Part 2

机译:临床工程重新审视:领导地位 - 第2部分

获取原文

摘要

A survey on two fundamental questions-Q_A: What is Clinical Engineering (CE)?, and Q_B: How can International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering (IFMBE) with its partners advance CE globally?-was e-mailed to the Clinical Engineering Division of the IFMBE (CED/IFMBE) members at large. The survey actually consists of ten sub-questions Q_A1-Q_A5 and Q_B1-Q_B5-This work presents feedback of the CED/IFMBE leadership related to question Q_B. The survey response rate was 35% (18/51). The answer on question 'Q_B1: Do/can we legislate?' was 'Yes' in 9/17 (53%) cases, and 'No' in 8/17 (47%) cases. The answer on question 'Q_B2: Do we register?' was 'Yes' in 11/16 (69%) cases, 'No' in 4/16 (25%) cases, and ambiguous in 1/16 (6%) case. The answer on question 'Q_B3: Do we certify?' was 'Yes' in 15/17 (88%) cases, and 'No' in 2/17 (12%) cases. The answers on question Q_B4 were descriptive, and on question 'Q_B5: Do we support accredited CE Undergraduate programs?' were 'Yes' in 9/12 (75%) cases, and 'No' in 3/12 (25%) cases. Corresponding white paper of the CED/IFMBE is to be published.
机译:关于两个基本问题的调查 - Q_A:什么是临床工程(CE)?,Q_B:国际医疗和生物工程联合会(IFMBE)如何与其合作伙伴推进CE全球?-WAS通过电子邮件发送给临床工程部门IFMBE(CED / IFMBE)成员大。调查实际上由十个子问题Q_A1-Q_A5和Q_B1-Q_B5 - 这项工作提供了与问题Q_B相关的CED / IFMBE领导的反馈。调查率为35%(18/51)。关于问题的答案'Q_B1:我们可以立法吗? 9/17(53%)案件中的“是”,并在8/17(47%)案件中的“否”。问题上的答案'q_b2:我们注册吗?' 11/16(69%)案件的“是”,在4/16(25%)案件中,“否”,1/16(6%)案件含糊不清。问题上的答案'Q_B3:我们是否证明?“在15/17(88%)案件中是“是”,2/17(12%)案件的“否”。问题上的答案Q_B4是描述性的,并且在问题上“Q_B5:我们支持认可的CE本科课程吗?在9月12日(75%)案件中是“是”,并在3/12(25%)案件中的“否”。 CED / IFMBE的相应白皮书将被公布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号