首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Informatics, Management, and Technology in Healthcare >Evaluating the Use of a PRO Questionnaire in Clinical Practice
【24h】

Evaluating the Use of a PRO Questionnaire in Clinical Practice

机译:评估PRO问卷在临床实践中的使用

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Aalborg University Hospital in Farso uses data from a patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire in order to predict if patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis will benefit from surgery. The purpose of including PRO in the decision-making is to ensure quality and transparency, to include patients in their own treatment, and to make the patients central to both the decision-making and the dialogue. Our evaluation of the use of the PRO questionnaire is based on the observation of patients filling out the questionnaire and interviews with 7 patients and a doctor. We found that there were several usability issues especially for the patients, such as navigation problems and a lack of consistency in the layout of the measurement scales. Furthermore, some questions were difficult for the patients to interpret. The interviewed patients did not report any value from answering the questionnaire. We argue that it may take more than filling out a questionnaire for the patient to feel involved in their own treatment.
机译:Aalborg大学在法院医院使用患者报告的结果(Pro)调查问卷的数据,以预测诊断患有骨关节炎的患者将受益于手术。在决策中包括专业人士的目的是确保质量和透明度,包括在自己的治疗中,并使患者核对决策和对话。我们对Pro问卷使用的使用评估是基于填写调查问卷和7名患者和医生的患者的观察。我们发现,特别是患者有几个可用性问题,例如导航问题和测量尺度布局中的缺乏一致性。此外,患者难以解释一些问题。采访的患者没有报告任何价值回答问卷。我们认为可能需要的不仅仅是填写患者调查问卷,以便涉及自己的待遇。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号