【24h】

Judicial Cooperation in the Criminal Field, after the Lisbon Treaty

机译:在里斯本条约之后犯罪领域的司法合作

获取原文

摘要

State frontiers have stopped representing, for a long time now, an obstacle for offenders, but, unfortunately, they continue to represent a barrier for law enforcement authorities. Through the Lisbon Treaty, the member states of the European Union have regulated the judicial cooperation in the criminal field aimed at ensuring concordance between this field and the evolution of society from a realistic and pragmatic perspective. By providing an area of freedom, security and justice, the European Union requires, firstly, the improvement of judicial cooperation between the member states in the criminal field, by respecting fundamental rights, as well as the different legal systems and traditions of the member states. After adhering, any member state, becomes involved in the process of harmonization of national criminal law with the European one and at the same time, in appropriating the principle of priority of Community law, the principle of performing all obligations in good faith; the principle of interpreting national law in conformity with European law and the principle of harmonizing national criminal law with the European one. But state sovereignty remains one of the limits of cooperation against crime between the EU member states, one of the solutions being the assistance that states mutually award one another in combating criminality, as regulated by the documents of the European Union.
机译:国家边疆已经停止代表,甚至很长一段时间,违规者的障碍,但不幸的是,他们继续代表执法当局的障碍。通过里斯本条约,欧洲联盟的成员国已经监管了犯罪领域的司法合作,旨在确保这一领域和社会的演变,从一个现实和务实的角度来看。通过提供自由,安全和正义的领域,欧洲联盟首先需要通过尊重基本权利,以及成员国的不同法律制度和传统,改善犯罪领域的成员国之间的司法合作。遵守任何成员国后,任何成员国都会参与与欧洲人的国家刑法协调,同时,在挪用社区法优先原则,诚信履行所有义务的原则;符合欧洲法律的解读原则及与欧洲国家刑法统一的原则。但国家主权仍然是欧盟成员国与欧盟成员国之间的犯罪合作的限制之一,其中一个解决方案是在欧洲联盟文件的监管下互相授予彼此相互奖励的援助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号