首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Product Management >Comparative Evaluation of Learning Curve Models for Construction Productivity Analysis
【24h】

Comparative Evaluation of Learning Curve Models for Construction Productivity Analysis

机译:学习曲线模型施工生产率分析的比较评价

获取原文

摘要

This paper investigates the role of learning curve models in estimating construction productivity. Learning curve theory is actively implemented for both the scheduling and cost estimation of complex construction projects. The purpose of the research is to assess the suitability of published learning curve models in effectively analyzing the learning phenomenon for substantially complex construction operations. The research investigates five (5) learning curve models, namely the (a) Straight-line or Wright, (b) Stanford "B", (c) Cubic, (d) Piecewise or Stepwise and (e) Exponential models. The methodology includes the comparative implementation of each one of the aforementioned models for the analysis of a large infrastructure project with the use of unit and cumulative productivity data. A two-stage investigative process for the five models was applied in order to define (a) the best-fit model for historical productivity data of completed construction activities and (b) the best predictor model of future performance. The assessment criterion for the suitability is the deviation of the real construction data from the predictions generated by each model. The research results indicate that the Cubic model dominates in terms of its predictive capability on historical data, while the Stanford "B" model is a better future performance predictor. Future research directions include the extension of the research scope with the inclusion of more learning curve models in conjunction with a populated database of historical field data.
机译:本文调查了学习曲线模型在估算施工生产率方面的作用。学习曲线理论是积极实施复杂建设项目的调度和成本估算。该研究的目的是评估公布的学习曲线模型的适用性,以有效分析了对基本复杂的施工操作的学习现象。该研究调查了五(5)个学习曲线模型,即(a)直线或赖特,(b)斯坦福“b”,(c)立方,(d)分段或逐步和(e)指数模型。该方法包括通过使用单元和累积生产力数据分析大型基础设施项目的每个上述模型的比较实现。应用了五种模型的两级调查过程,以便定义(a)完成建筑活动的历史生产力数据的最佳拟合模型,(b)未来性能的最佳预测仪模型。适用性的评估标准是真实施工数据从每个模型产生的预测偏差。研究结果表明,立方模型在其历史数据上的预测能力方面占主导地位,而斯坦福“B”模型是未来的更好的性能预测因素。未来的研究方向包括将研究范围扩展,并将更多的学习曲线模型与历史现场数据的填充数据库一起使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号