首页> 外文会议>International Conference of Science Educators and Teachers >Comparisons between students' learning achievements of their conventional instruction and the science, technology and social conceptual instructional design on digestion system issue of secondary students at the 10th grade level
【24h】

Comparisons between students' learning achievements of their conventional instruction and the science, technology and social conceptual instructional design on digestion system issue of secondary students at the 10th grade level

机译:学生学习成果与常规教学与科学,技术与社会概念教学设计的比较,在10年级中学生中的消化系统问题

获取原文

摘要

The purposes of this action research study were 1) to develop learning activities according to the instructional designing model of science, technology, and social (STS) on Digestion Issue, 2) to compare students' learning achievements between their learning activities with the conventional instructional (CIM) and conceptual instructional designing methods of science, technology, and social (STS) on digestion system of secondary students at the 10th grade level with a sample size of 35 experimental student group of their STS learning method, and 91 controlling group in two classes in the first semester in academic year 2016. Using the 4-Instructional Innovative Lesson Plans, the Students' Learning Behaviour Observing Form, the Questionnaire on Teacher Behaviour Interaction (QTBI), the Researcher's Recording Form, the Learning Activity Form, and the Parallel Learning Achievement Test (LAT) were assessed. The results of this research have found that; the Index of Item Objective Congruence (IOC) value ranged from 0.67 to 1.00; the difficulty values were 0.47 and 0.79 for the CIM and STS methods, respectively, the discriminative validity for the LAT was ranged from 0.20 to 0.75. The reliability of the QTBI was 0.79. Students' responses of their learning achievements with the average means scores indicted of the normalized gain values of 0.79 for the STS group, and 0.50 and 0.36 for the CIM groups, respectively. Students' learning achievements of their post-test indicated that of a higher than pre-test, the pre-test and post-test assessments were also differentiated evidence at the 0.05 levels for the STS and CIM groups, significantly. The 22-students' learning outcomes from the STS group evidences at a high level, only of the 9-students' responses in a moderate level were developed of their learning achievements, responsibility.
机译:这项行动研究的目的是:1)根据科学,技术,社会(STS)消化问题的教学设计模式,2)学习他们的学习活动之间的成绩与传统教学比较学生制定学习活动(CIM)和科学,技术,社会(STS)中学生在第10年级与35实验学生群体的STS的样本大小的消化系统学习方法的概念的教学设计方法,以及91控制组中有两个班第一学期学年2016年使用4教学创新的课程计划,学生的学习行为观测表,问卷上的教师行为交互(QTBI),研究者的记录表,学习活动的形式,和并行学习成就测验(LAT)进行了评估。这项研究的结果发现;项目目标同余(IOC)值的指数范围为0.67〜1.00;难度值分别为CIM和STS方法,分别用于LAT的辨别有效性范围从0.20到0.75 0.47和0.79。所述QTBI的可靠性为0.79。学生自己分别为CIM集团起诉的0.79为STS组,0.50和0.36的归一化增益值,平均得分手段学习成绩的响应。学生学习他们测试后的成果表明,比前测高,预测试和试验后评估是也是有区别的证据在0.05水平为STS和CIM组,显著。这位22学生的学习从STS组证据的结果在一个较高的水平,只有9学生在一个中等水平的反应,开发他们的学习成果,责任。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号