首页> 外文会议>National Seminar on Food Security and Food Production >Social Dynamics and Determinants of Food and Nutrition Security: Empirical Research Evidences in Uttar Pradesh
【24h】

Social Dynamics and Determinants of Food and Nutrition Security: Empirical Research Evidences in Uttar Pradesh

机译:食品与营养安全的社会动态与决定因素:北方邦的实证研究证据

获取原文

摘要

Ensuring food security continues to be an issue of vital importance. The Millennium Development Goals (MDG) provide us with the starting point to assess the level of food security and prioritise our efforts to achieve it. The first development goal seeks to eradicate extreme poverty and hunger. In the post-economic reform period in India, the Relative Price of Food (RPF) has become one of the important factors in explaining variations in poverty. How does an increase in the RPF affect rural poverty in India? This question necessitates an analytical and empirical understanding. Sen (1996) claims that agricultural productivity and public development expenditure result in a much better explanation of pre-reform and post-reform poverty. Ravallion (1998)uses 24 observations of the National Sample Survey (NSS) rounds from 1958 to 1993-4, and obtains a correlation of 0.76 between poverty (the Headcount ratio, HCR) and RPF. Although this confirms the claim made by critics of the economic reforms of a strong positive correlation between measured poverty and RPF, Ravallion rejects the explanation that this correlation is driven by the adverse distributional effect of changes in RFP, and maintains that the correlation is due to the mean effect via depressedmean per capita consumption. It may be mentioned here that many of the poor are unambiguously hurt by the inflation. Higher food prices hurt all households who are net purchasers of food. Apart from the whole of the urban population who are net purchasers, even among the rural households more than 50% are net purchasers of food. Despite the fact that NSS tabulations do not reveal which rural households are net consumers or producers of food, there is sufficient proxy evidence.
机译:确保粮食安全仍然是至关重要的问题。千年发展目标(MDG)为我们提供了评估粮食安全水平的起点,并优先考虑我们实现它的努力。第一个发展目标旨在消除极端的贫困和饥饿。在印度后经后经济改革期间,食品的相对价格(RPF)已成为解释贫困变化的重要因素之一。 RPF如何增加印度农村贫困?这个问题需要分析和经验的理解。 Sen(1996)声称农产品生产力和公共发展支出导致更好地解释改革前和改革后贫困。 Ravallion(1998)使用1958年至1993 - 4的国家样本调查(NSS)轮次的观察结果,并在贫困(头部比率,HCR)和RPF之间进行0.76的相关性。虽然这证实了批评贫困和RPF之间具有强大正相关的经济改革的批评,但ravallion拒绝了解释,这种相关性因RFP变化的不利分布效果而导致,并认为相关性是由于人均消费的抑郁师均值效应。这里可以提到的是,许多穷人被通胀明确地伤害了。更高的食品价格伤害了所有净购买食物的家庭。除了整个净购买者的城市人口外,甚至在农村家庭中超过50%的是食物的净购买者。尽管NSS列表没有透露哪些农村家庭是净消费者或食品生产商,但有足够的代理证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号