首页> 外文会议>Symposium on the Significance of Faecal Indicators in Water >FAECAL INDICATORS IN DRINKING WATER - IS IT TIME TO MOVE ON?
【24h】

FAECAL INDICATORS IN DRINKING WATER - IS IT TIME TO MOVE ON?

机译:饮用水中的粪便指标 - 是时候前进了吗?

获取原文

摘要

Assurance that drinking water is microbially safe has traditionally been determined by measuring bacterial indicators of water quality, most commonly total coliforms and E. coli. This chapter addresses four questions. i. Should we continue to rely on these? ii. Are these indicators sufficient to ensure microbial water quality? iii. Should we adopt a more holistic approach? iv. We have our risk management systems, our drinking water safety plans; does this mean that we could comfortably move, by focussing more on risk management, away from our reliance on end point testing? Total coliforms have been shown to be a poor parameter for measuring the potential for faecal contamination of drinking water due to their presence as natural inhabitants of soil and water environments, their ability to grow in distribution systems and their inconsistent presence in water supplies during outbreaks of waterbome disease. All these points make it difficult to interpret the sanitary significance of their presence (in the absence of E. coli) or have confidence in water quality in their absence.
机译:保证饮用水是微生物安全的,传统上是通过测量水质细菌指标,最常见的总大肠杆菌和大肠杆菌的细菌指标来确定。本章解决了四个问题。一世。我们应该继续依靠这些吗? II。这些指标是否足以确保微生物水质? III。我们应该采用更全面的方法吗? IV。我们拥有我们的风险管理系统,我们的饮用水安全计划;这是否意味着我们可以舒适地移动,通过缩聚风险管理,远离我们对终点测试的依赖?由于其存在作为土壤和水环境的天然居民,它们在土壤和水环境中的天然居民的存在,它们在分配系统中生长的能力以及它们在水资源中的存在能力,可以成为衡量饮用水粪便污染的潜力的差参数。水煎服疾病。所有这些点都使得难以解释它们存在的卫生意义(在没有大肠杆菌的情况下)或者在缺席的情况下对水质有信心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号