首页> 外文会议>Rapra International Conference on Encocrine Disruptors >WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE REVIEW TO DETERMINE ENDOCRINE DISRUPTING PROPERTIES OF ACTIVE SUBSTANCES
【24h】

WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE REVIEW TO DETERMINE ENDOCRINE DISRUPTING PROPERTIES OF ACTIVE SUBSTANCES

机译:证据重量审查以确定活性物质的内分泌破坏性质

获取原文

摘要

The European legislation on plant protection products (Regulation (EC) No. 1107/2009) sets out new, stricter, criteria for approval of active substances and includes the assessment of endocrine disrupting properties. Active substances that are endocrine disruptors will not be approved under the new regulation unless there is negligible exposure to humans and non-target species. In addition to this, endocrine disrupting substances approved because of negligible exposure will become candidates for substitution with less hazardous substances during the authorisation stage at Member State level. The burden of proof is placed on the notifier. One way of determining whether a substance is an endocrine disrupter is to use a weight of evidence (WoE) approach to evaluate all available data. We have reviewed two published WoE frameworks for the assessment of endocrine disrupting properties of chemicals (CEFIC EMSG 1999, Brown et al. 2001) and combined elements of each into a practical WoE evaluation for active substances in plant protection products. The combined framework consists of four evaluation steps: 1) Study reliability — quality of work undertaken, 2) Study relevance — endpoint relevance to endocrine disruption, 3) Study significance — based on the earlier assessments made for reliability and relevance, and 4) Balance of the weight of evidence, coherence and gap assessment. The method makes full use of endpoints available in standard regulatory toxicity and ecotoxicity studies for indications of endocrine effects and any relevant information in the open literature. Experience indicates that regulatory studies required for product approval will identify indicative endocrine disruption, but targeted supporting in vitro and in vivo studies (either from open literature or commissioned) are required to confirm an endocrine mode of action for any effects that are observed. This approach provides substantive, robust evidence for notifiers and regulators to prioritise substances under the new regulatory requirements.
机译:欧洲对植物保护产品的立法(监管(EC)第1107/2009号)阐述了批准活性物质的新的,更严格的标准,并包括对内分泌破坏性质的评估。除非对人类和非目标物种的暴露可忽略不计,否则内分泌干扰者的活性物质将不会被批准。除此之外,由于曝光可忽略的曝光,内分泌扰乱物质遭到批准的物质,将成为成员国一级的授权阶段的危险物质替代候选人。证据负担放在通知器上。确定物质是内分泌失去的一种方法是使用重量的证据(WOE)方法来评估所有可用数据。我们已审查了两种公布的WOE框架,用于评估化学物质的内分泌破坏性质(Cefic Emsg 1999,Brown等,2001)和各自为植物保护产品中活性物质的实际WOE评价中的组合元素。合并框架由四个评估步骤组成:1)研究可靠性 - 进行的工作质量,2)研究相关性 - 终点与内分泌中断的相关性,3)研究意义 - 基于先前的可靠性和相关性,4)余额证据重量,一致性和差距评估。该方法充分利用标准调节毒性和生态毒性研究的终点,以适应内分泌效应和开放文学中的任何相关信息。经验表明,产品批准所需的监管研究将识别指示性内分泌破坏,但在体外和体内研究(公开文学或委托)需要靶向支持,以确认对观察到的任何效果的内分泌作用模式。这种方法为通知和监管机构提供了实质性,强大的证据,以确定在新的监管要求下的物质优先考虑物质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号