首页> 外文会议>American Society For Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >ENGINEERING 'MANPOWER' SHORTAGES, REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AND THE 1960 CALIFORNIA MASTER PLAN FOR HIGHER EDUCATION: HISTORICAL LESSONS ON ENGINEERING WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
【24h】

ENGINEERING 'MANPOWER' SHORTAGES, REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AND THE 1960 CALIFORNIA MASTER PLAN FOR HIGHER EDUCATION: HISTORICAL LESSONS ON ENGINEERING WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT

机译:工程“人力”短缺,区域经济发展和1960年加州高等教育总体规划:工程劳动力发展的历史课程

获取原文

摘要

As demonstrated by accounts such as Thomas Friedman's The World is Flat and the Engineer of 2020 investigations by the National Academy of Engineering, engineering educators are once again focusing on necessary changes to our national engineering workforce. If there ever were an opportunity draw useful lessons from history, it would surely be on this topic. Concerns about an "engineering manpower" crisis persisted throughout the Cold War years in American history, fueled by massive federal expenditures and the emphasis placed on science and its application to the nation's arsenal and economic wealth. Even as we proceed to transform, if not dismantle, the institutional apparatus developed to meet the exigencies of the Cold War period, it may well pay to look at the original architects who transformed the American system of higher education in their efforts to deliver upon the new demands for a technically trained workforce. As drawn from a larger book project, this paper aims to provide new historical insights by looking at how the engineering 'manpower' crisis of the 1950s contributed to the 1960 Master Plan for Higher Education in California, and how the Master Plan, in turn, shaped engineering education within the state. The California public system of higher education was already set up as a relatively novel, tripartite system that created separate estates for junior colleges, state colleges, and the University of California system. However, as documented by California historians such as Roger Lotchin, the massive expansion of Southern California's defense sector, along with demographic shifts in the college-going population, made questions of technical workforce development a major issue in California's political scene. This regional development also intersected with ongoing national dialogues about engineering education and engineering manpower shortages, which although exacerbated and politically amplified by Sputnik, pre-dated the specific crisis.
机译:正如托马斯弗里德曼的账户所证明的,托马斯弗里德曼的世界是平坦的,并且2020年国家工程学院的调查的工程师,工程教育者再次关注我们国家工程劳动力的必要变革。如果有机会从历史上汲取有用的课程,那就肯定会在这个话题。在美国历史上整个冷战期间持续存在关于“工程人力”危机的担忧,由大规模的联邦支出以及对科学的重点以及对国家的阿森纳和经济财富的强调。即使我们继续转换,如果没有拆除,制度设备也为满足冷战期的豁免,它可能会付出代价,以了解改变美国高等教育体系的原始建筑师,以努力提供技术训练有素的劳动力的新要求。正如从更大的书籍项目中得出的那样,本文旨在通过观察20世纪50年代的工程“人力”危机如何为加利福尼亚州的高等教育筹备方案以及总体规划方式贡献了新的历史洞察,而且依次,国家内的工程教育。加州公共教育系统已被建立为一个相对小说的三方系统,为初中大学,州立大学和加州大学制定了单独的庄园。然而,正如罗杰·诗人等加利福尼亚州的历史学家所涉嫌,南加州国防部门的大规模扩张以及大学人口的人口转变,就加州政治效果提出了技术劳动力发展的问题。这种区域发展还与正在进行的工程教育和工程人力短缺的持续的国家对话,尽管由烟囱急促和政治放大,但预先约会了特定的危机。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号