首页> 外文会议>ASEE Annual Conference Exposition >Ethics in Context, Ethics in Action: Getting beyond the individual professional in engineering ethics education
【24h】

Ethics in Context, Ethics in Action: Getting beyond the individual professional in engineering ethics education

机译:背景下的道德,行动道德:超越了工程伦理教育的个人专业

获取原文

摘要

A number of authors have challenged engineering ethics educators to incorporate elements of what may be called "macroethics," "social ethics" or considerations related to the field of science and technology studies (STS) in engineering ethics curricula. To respond to this call effectively requires reform of both content and pedagogy. A new advanced course on engineering ethics uses readings from philosophy, science and technology studies, and feminist and postcolonial science studies to examine questions that necessarily challenge foundational assumptions of engineering, which not only underlie all of what scientists and engineers undertake in their work, but also require the active involvement of citizens outside of science and engineering. Students encounter new visions for science and engineering that integrate a variety of ethical considerations that mean to address critiques encountered throughout the course. Pedagogies of liberation are employed in order to accomplish three outcomes. First, classroom responsibility shifts echo the lessons learned from STS around engineers' responsibility properly contextualized. Second, a focus on critical thinking and creativity stimulate critiques of the classroom learning process as well as approaches to course material and ethics problems. Third, an orientation toward praxis grounds theory in real communities that generate problems addressed by ethics approaches, resulting ultimately in transformative action in collaboration with the community of origin. This paper describes course objectives, content, and pedagogy, and presents specific innovations that shift responsibility, stimulate critical thinking, and create opportunities for students to engage in praxis. Results of assessment are discussed, with a focus on the scaffolding required to assist engineering students in adjusting to new content and methods.
机译:许多提交人具有挑战的工程伦理教育者,将可能被称为“宏观的”的要素,“社会道德”或与工程伦理课程中的科学和技术研究(STS)有关的考虑因素。要有效地回复此呼叫,需要改革内容和教育学。新的工程伦理进步课程使用哲学,科学和技术研究的读物,女权主义和后殖民科学研究,以研究一定要挑战工程的基础假设的问题,这不仅支持所有科学家和工程师在其工作中承诺,而且还需要公民的积极参与科学和工程之外。学生遇到新的科学和工程的愿景,整合了各种道德考虑因而意味着解决整个课程遇到的批评。利用解放的教学人员,以完成三个结果。首先,课堂责任转换从Sts围绕工程师的责任进行了呼应的经验教训正常化。其次,重点关注批判性思维和创造力刺激课堂学习过程的批评以及课程材料和道德问题的方法。第三,对现实社区的普拉西地理论的方向产生道德方法所解决的问题,最终导致与原产社区合作的转型性行动。本文介绍了课程目标,内容和教育学,并提出了改变责任,刺激批判性思维的具体创新,为学生参与普拉西斯的机会。讨论了评估结果,重点是协助工程学生调整新内容和方法所需的脚手架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号