首页> 外文会议>International Technology,Education and Development Conference >(361)COMPARISON BETWEEN COOPERATIVE COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION AND INDIVIDUAL COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION ON STUDENTS PERFORMANCE WITH DIFFERENT COGNITIVE STYLES
【24h】

(361)COMPARISON BETWEEN COOPERATIVE COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION AND INDIVIDUAL COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION ON STUDENTS PERFORMANCE WITH DIFFERENT COGNITIVE STYLES

机译:(361)合作计算机辅助教学与不同认知风格学生性能的个人计算机辅助教学的比较

获取原文

摘要

The main purpose of the study is to compare the cooperative computer-assisted instruction (CAI)approach to individual CAI approach in the teaching and learning of the topic ‘linear equation’ inMathematics. The effect of these approaches on academic performance and motivation of students withdifferent cognitive styles, field dependence (FD)and field independence (FI)was examined. Amultimedia courseware entitled ‘Mathematics For Secondary School’ provided by the Malaysian Ministryof Education was used for the study. This study used a [2 X 2] quasi-experimental factorial design withpretest and posttest. The study was carried out for two weeks with a sample of 80 secondary schoolstudents aged between 14 and 15 years old. The independent variables were the two treatments(cooperative CAI and individual CAI), the dependent variable was the students’ academic performanceand the moderator variable was the cognitive style of field dependence-independence. Four researchquestions were put forward and four main hypotheses were formulated and tested using descriptivestatistics and inferential statistics (t-test and ANCOVA). Research findings showed that the cooperativeCAI mode contributes a higher academic performance among students compared to individual CAI.Secondly, the cooperative CAI mode also brings about higher academic performance for both the fielddependence-independence students. Thirdly, there were no changes in motivation among the fieldindependencestudents using the cooperative CAI and individual CAI. However, the field-dependencestudents showed a higher motivation score using the cooperative CAI mode compared to the individualCAI. Over all, most of the students in the cooperative CAI learning group show positive perceptiontowards the implementation of cooperative learning. The implication of the study suggests thatcooperative learning in a multimedia computer based learning environment should be used as aninstructional strategy in mathematics teaching.
机译:该研究的主要目的是将合作计算机辅助指令(CAI)方法与主题“线性方程”INMatmatics的教学和学习中的单个CAI方法进行比较。研究了这些方法对具有各种认知风格,现场依赖(FD)和场独立性(FI)的学生的学术表现和动机的影响。题为马来西亚教育部提供的“中学数学”的Amultimedia课件用于该研究。本研究使用了A [2 x 2]准实验阶段设计,最高和后测试。该研究进行了两周,其中80名年龄在14至15岁之间的次级学龄儿所的样本。独立变量是两种治疗(合作CAI和个人CAI),受抚养变量是学生的学术表演,主持人变量是现场依赖性独立性的认知风格。提出了四项研究,并使用描述性和推理统计(T检验和Ancova)制定并测试了四个主要假设。研究结果表明,与个体的蔡先生相比,CooperativeCai模式有助于学生的学术表现更高。合作CAI模式也为FieldDependence-Indepence Indepence学生带来了更高的学术表现。第三,使用合作CAI和个体CAI的FieldIndendEncentudenti定的动机没有变化。然而,与个体电视相比,使用协同CAI模式显示出较高的动机分数。全部,大多数学生在合作社蔡学习集团展示了合作学习的积极感知。该研究的含义表明,在数学教学中应该被用作多媒体计算机的学习环境中的基于多媒体计算机的学习。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号