首页> 外文OA文献 >Dental Anatomy Carving Computer-Assisted Instruction Program: An Assessment of Student Performance and Perceptions
【2h】

Dental Anatomy Carving Computer-Assisted Instruction Program: An Assessment of Student Performance and Perceptions

机译:牙体解剖雕刻计算机辅助教学程序:对学生表现和知觉的评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of students exposed to two different instructional modalities for dental anatomy wax carving: CAI (computer-assisted instruction) using DVD technology, or traditional laboratory instruction. Students’ self-assessment scores were also compared to faculty scores, and students’ perceptions of their teaching modality were analyzed. Seventy-three first-year dental students (response rate 81 percent) participated in this randomized single blind trial, in which faculty graders were blinded to student group assignment. There were no statistical differences, as determined by the Wilcoxon non-parametric test and a t-test, between the faculty grades on the wax carving from the two teaching methods the students experienced. The student self-assessments revealed higher mean grades (3.0 for the DVD-only group and 3.1 for the traditional group) than the faculty actual mean grades (2.2 for both the DVD-only group and the traditional group) by almost one grade level on a 4.0 grade scale. Similar percentages of students in the traditional group had either favorable or unfavorable perceptions of their learning experience, while more students in the DVD-only group reported favorable perceptions. Students from both groups said they wanted more faculty feedback in the course. Based on these objective and subjective data, merging CAI and traditional laboratory teaching may best enhance student learning needs.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较暴露于两种不同形式的牙齿解剖蜡雕教学方法的学生的表现:使用DVD技术的CAI(计算机辅助教学)或传统的实验室教学法。还将学生的自我评估分数与教师分数进行比较,并分析学生对其教学方式的看法。七十三名一年级牙科学生(答复率为81%)参加了这项随机单盲试验,该试验中,教师评分员对学生分组的分配不知情。根据Wilcoxon非参数检验和t检验,在两种学生教学方法上蜡雕师资等级之间没有统计学差异。学生的自我评估显示,其平均成绩(仅DVD组为3.0,传统组为3.1)比教师的实际平均成绩(仅DVD组和传统组均为2.2)高出近一个等级。 4.0等级量表。传统组中有相似百分比的学生对他们的学习经历有好感或不好感,而仅使用DVD的组中有更多学生表示好感。两组学生都表示,他们希望在课程中获得更多的教师反馈。基于这些客观和主观数据,将CAI与传统实验室教学相结合可以最好地满足学生的学习需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号