首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >Technological Literacy, Engineering Literacy, Engineers, Public Officials and the Public
【24h】

Technological Literacy, Engineering Literacy, Engineers, Public Officials and the Public

机译:技术识字,工程识字,工程师,公职人员和公众

获取原文

摘要

In 2017 The Technological and Engineering Literacy and Philosophy Division of the American Society for Engineering Education initiated a debate on "for whom" and "what" are studies in technological and engineering literacy for. This study presents a case for technological and engineering literacy for all. This is achieved by analysis of currently available documentation and in particular to the ASH report and BBC "Newsnight" documentaries on the on-going case of the Grenfell Fire tragedy of the 14th June 2017. On the data currently available this study reveals an apparent lack of engineering expertise in the planning, implementation and approval of the substantial refurbishment of the building. While the study demonstrates the validity of Krupczak et als distinction between technological and engineering literacy, it also suggests that the attention given to science and technology to the exclusion of engineering by the media may prevent the public from asking key questions about the role of engineering in such developments. It is argued that a major purpose of a curriculum in engineering and technological literacy is to better enable the public to ask and better understand the answers to questions that such disasters cause. Following Bucciarelli it is noted that the different elites involved understanding the engineering and social problems from different perspectives or object worlds that are governed by the different languages they use. In this case fire safety engineers are one of those elites. It is argued that the public as defined by the residents of the tower and associated housing including tower blocks in the vicinity are an elite. They provide the justification for teaching engineering literacy let alone technological literacy. The challenge for engineering literacy is to develop a "bridging" language so as they may better communicate with the other elites including those representing the law. Following a brief introduction, the Grenfell Tower Block is described, the overall purposes of its refurbishment outlined, and the management organisation described. The purposes, and function of the ASH report are outlined. The primary and secondary causes of the fire as currently understood are summarised. The implications for professional engineering are considered and questions the public should seek answers to are listed. From the perspectives of technological literacy two issues are considered, namely fake news, and the role of prejudice in public perceptions of what happened. It is concluded that a radically different approach to the design of the curriculum will be required if the public are to become engaged in engineering and technological literacy.
机译:2017年,美国工程教育学会的技术和工程扫盲和哲学部门发起了关于技术和工程素养的“为谁”和“什么”的辩论。本研究为所有人提供了一种技术和工程素养的案例。这是由当前可用的文档的分析,特别是在14日的建富火灾悲剧六月2017年在现有的这项研究的数据的持续的情况下,ASH报告,BBC“新闻之夜”的纪录片取得揭示了一个明显缺乏在规划,实施和批准大楼的规划,实施和批准中的工程专业知识。虽然该研究展示了Krupczak等人的有效性,但技术和工程扫盲的区别,它还表明,媒体排除工程的科学和技术的关注可能会阻止公众提出关于工程作用的关键问题这种发展。有人认为,在工程和技术识字课程中的一个主要目的是更好地使公众能够要求和更好地了解这些灾害原因的问题的答案。在Bucciarelli之后,指出,不同的精英涉及从他们使用的不同语言管理的不同观点或对象世界的工程和社会问题。在这种情况下,消防安全工程师是其中一个精英。据称,塔楼居民和附近包括塔楼的居民和附近的公众是精英。他们为教学工程识字术提供了理由,更不用说技术识字。工程素养的挑战是开发一种“桥接”语言,因此他们可以更好地与其他精英沟通,包括代表法律的精英。简要介绍,描述了Grenfell Tower块,其翻新的整体目的以及描述的管理组织。概述了ASH报告的目的和功能。总结了当前理解的火的主要和二次原因。考虑了对专业工程的影响,公众应寻求答案的问题。从技术识字的角度来看,考虑了两个问题,即假新闻,以及偏见在公众看法发生的作用。结论是,如果公众参与工程和技术识字,则需要对课程设计的自然不同的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号