首页> 外文会议>American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition >Engineering Supplemental Instruction: Impact on Sophomore Level Engineering Courses
【24h】

Engineering Supplemental Instruction: Impact on Sophomore Level Engineering Courses

机译:工程补充指导:对二年级学生级工程课程的影响

获取原文

摘要

Active learning strategies, through newly focused engineering Supplemental Instruction (SI) sessions, were provided in sophomore level, gateway engineering courses at Louisiana State University beginning in the spring semester of 2013. This program operates as an independent subgroup of the university's current SI program to allow particular focus on training engineering student leaders with effective teaching skills specific to their discipline. The goal of this effort is to improve student comprehension and passing rates in historically difficult gateway classes to engineering where most students fail or drop the course (earning D, F, or W). These courses include statics, dynamics, fluids, strengths, thermodynamics, and circuits. SI leaders providing the supplemental instruction sessions are required to attend the course lectures, to meet on a regular basis with the SI Coordinator and the course professor, to provide office hours for students, and to hold weekly sessions to review course material using active learning strategies. Implementing unbiased evaluation of the direct success of the program is difficult due to different instructors (each with different exams), different students, and other human factors; however, a few trends can be observed. Reported herein are preliminary results of the program across four semesters (two spring, one summer, and one fall). On average for all courses included in this program, students who did not attend any SI sessions were 60.62 ± 0.04% likely to pass with an A, B, or C. Those who attended only a few sessions (one to three) had a 66.92 ± 0.07% likelihood of passing the class. Students with regular session attendance (four or more sessions) had a fairly substantial increased likelihood of passing the course, 77.41 ± 0.09%. This difference is statistically significant with a p value of less than 0.0001. Feedback from SI leaders show that the benefits of this program extend beyond the impact on those enrolled in the courses - SI's report an increase in their own understanding of the material covered in these courses, greater confidence in their ability to lead discussions, as well as other positive professional and personal growth.
机译:通过新集中的工程补充指导(SI)会议的主动学习策略是在2013年春季学期开始的大学摩托车级,网关工程课程。该计划作为该大学目前的SI计划的独立亚组经营特别关注培训工程学生领导者,具有特定于其纪律的教学技巧。这项努力的目标是提高学生理解和在历史上困难的网关课程中通过率来工程,大多数学生失败或放弃课程(赚取D,F或W)。这些课程包括静态,动力学,流体,优点,热力学和电路。提供补充指导会议的SI领导人需要参加课程讲座,以定期与SI协调员和课程教授定期满足学生的办公时间,并持有每周会议,以便使用主动学习策略审查课程材料。由于不同的教练(每次不同的考试),不同的学生和其他人类因素,实施对计划的直接成功的无偏见评估难以偏见;但是,可以观察到一些趋势。这里报道的是四个学期(两个春季,一个夏天和一个秋天)的程序的初步结果。平均所有课程包括在本计划中,没有参加任何SI课程的学生是50.62±0.04%,可能有一个A,B,或C.那些参加几次会议的人(一到三个)有66.92通过班级的±0.07%的可能性。经常会议出勤的学生(四个或更多次会议)的课程较大的可能性相当大幅增加,77.41±0.09%。这种差异在统计学上具有小于0.0001的p值。 SI领导人的反馈表明,该计划的好处延伸超出了对参加课程的人的影响 - SI的报告对这些课程所涵盖的材料的增加,对他们举行讨论的能力更大的信心,以及其他积极的专业和个人成长。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号