首页> 外文会议>ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition >First-Year Students Who Leave Engineering: Learning Styles and Self-Reported Perceptions
【24h】

First-Year Students Who Leave Engineering: Learning Styles and Self-Reported Perceptions

机译:离开工程的一年学生:学习风格和自我报告的感知

获取原文

摘要

Many engineering programs/schools would like to reduce student attrition. Implementing successful special courses or activities to retain students depends on identifying major reasons for student attrition. This study therefore sought to identify reasons cited by students for leaving the School of Engineering at Tulane University, and explored whether retention of first-year engineering students could be correlated to the learning styles of these students. All students leaving engineering during the 2002/2003 academic year had the opportunity to voluntarily and anonymously complete an exit survey which asked students to identify their reasons for leaving engineering. Additionally, we administered Felder's Index of Learning Styles (ILS) to all first-semester students in Tulane's introductory engineering course. Participation was voluntary and uncompensated. Students were not informed of their assessment outcomes, and were identified only by code number for analyses. The exit survey was completed by 42 students, and learning style information and/or various demographic data were obtained for 209 first-year students. The most frequently-cited known "destination" for students leaving engineering was the School of Business. The most frequently-cited reasons for leaving engineering included "I just don't seem to be like other engineers" and "I want to take classes that will give me more opportunities to have discussions or talk about opinions and views". The students who left engineering and Tulane University during their first semester included a higher percentage of ILS-identified global learners (70%; n = 10) than the students who left Tulane during their second semester (53%, n = 15), who transferred to other majors during their first year (33%, n = 21), or who were retained in engineering to the second year (40%; n = 121). Although the sample sizes in this study were small due to the size of the school, the results are important to educators interested in retaining first-year students - including, to the best of our knowledge, the first published link between ILS-identified global learners and attrition from engineering.
机译:许多工程计划/学校希望减少学生的消磨。实施成功的特殊课程或活动,留住学生取决于识别学生消失的主要原因。因此,这项研究试图确定学生引用的原因,以便将工程学院留在坦纳大学,并探讨了持有第一年工程学生的保留与这些学生的学习方式相关。在2002/2003年学年期间留下工程的所有学生都有机会自愿,匿名地完成退出调查,要求学生确定他们离开工程的原因。此外,我们将Felder在Tulane介绍工程课程中的所有第一个学生的学习方式(ILS)的学习方式(ILS)指数。参与是自愿和未补偿的。学生没有被告知他们的评估结果,并且仅通过代码编号来确定的分析。退出调查由42名学生完成,学习风格信息和/或各种人口统计数据获得209名一年的学生。为学生离开工程的学生最常见的已知“目的地”是商学院。留下工程的最常见的原因包括“我似乎并不像其他工程师”和“我想乘坐课程,让我有更多机会讨论或谈论意见和观点”。在第一学期期间离开工程和云南大学的学生包括比在第二个学期(53%,N = 15)中留下TULANE的学生(70%; n = 10)更高百分比的ILS鉴定的全球学习者(70%; n = 10)在第一年转移到其他专业(33%,N = 21),或者在工程中保留在第二年(40%; n = 121)。虽然本研究中的样本大小由于学校的规模而小,但结果对兴趣保留第一年的学生的教育工作者来说很重要 - 包括我们所知,ILS确定的全球学习者之间的第一个发布的联系与工程的磨损。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号