首页> 外文会议>ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition >The Impact of Faculty-Mentored Versus Web-Guided Engineering Design Experience on Freshman Skills
【24h】

The Impact of Faculty-Mentored Versus Web-Guided Engineering Design Experience on Freshman Skills

机译:教师媒体对网引导的工程设计经验对新生技能的影响

获取原文

摘要

This study explores the impact of freshman engineering design experiences on student engineering design-related perceptions and performance. The impact of two teaching methods, faculty-mentoring versus web-guidance, used in the teaching of engineering design were also explored. Four skills associated with engineering design were assessed: open-ended problem solving, information search, mechanical building, and teamwork. Web-use related skill of information search was also assessed. Assessment methods included: pre- and post-activity student skill self-report surveys, observations of student teamwork and presentations, student interviews, and performance scoring of team design notebooks using a scoring rubric developed for design-related activities. Post-activity student skill self-reports revealed statistically significant gains in problem solving and mechanical building skills for Mentored and Web-guided groups when compared with pre-activity responses. Performance assessment of the Web-guided group using a team-based engineering design work scoring system showed higher scores for the use of technical concepts in the design process than the Mentored group. Based on teamwork observations and performance assessments of design notebooks, it was concluded that Web-guided students' higher scores in this skill were due to the fact that the web-based electronic design portfolio template, or Design Process Templates, helped students complete pertinent steps in the design process. This data also revealed that students in the Web-guided group were hampered by differences in HTML programming skills within the group. This difference limited some students' ability to act as a team in using the Web-based Design Process Templates for much of their design work. This issue was a particular problem for women who reported lower pre-activity HTML programming skills than men. Furthermore, instructor versus student conceptions of the design process hampered some students' use of the Design Process Templates.
机译:本研究探讨了新生工程设计经验对学生工程设计相关的看法和性能的影响。还探讨了两种教学方法,教学方法对工程设计教学的影响。评估了与工程设计相关的四种技能:开放式问题解决,信息搜索,机械建筑和团队合作。还评估了网络使用相关技能的信息搜索。评估方法包括:活动前和活动后学生技能自我报告调查,学生团队合作和演示的观察,学生访谈和团队设计笔记本的性能评分使用分量标题为设计有关的活动开发。活动后的学生技能自我报告显示出在与活动前响应相比时解决问题解决和机械建筑技能的统计上显着的提升。使用基于团队的工程设计工作评分系统的Web引导组的性能评估显示了在设计过程中使用的技术概念比Mentored Group更高。基于团队合作观测和设计笔记本电脑的绩效评估,得出的结论是,该技能的Web引导学生更高的分数是由于基于网络的电子设计组合模板或设计过程模板,帮助学生完成了相关步骤在设计过程中。该数据还透露,网络引导群体中的学生因集团内的HTML编程技能的差异而受到阻碍。这一差异限制了一些学生在使用基于Web的设计过程模板的团队中的一些学生的能力,以便他们的大部分设计工作。这个问题对报告比男性更低的活动的妇女来说是一个特殊问题。此外,教练与设计过程的学生概念妨碍了一些学生使用设计过程模板。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号