首页> 外文会议>ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition >Standardizing Outcomes Assessment Allows Faculty to Focus on Student Learning
【24h】

Standardizing Outcomes Assessment Allows Faculty to Focus on Student Learning

机译:标准化结果评估允许教师专注于学生学习

获取原文

摘要

Outcomes assessment is best viewed as a means to an end, not a goal in itself. It is a tool meant to produce improved student learning (both in terms of what is being learned and how well it is being learned), so we must avoid the trap of spending all our time and energy on assessment and not having any left to make the changes necessary for improved learning. Most faculty members are already overloaded with teaching, research and service responsibilities, so even if they believe assessment is a useful activity they will often resist it as much as possible to avoid the extra workload. The key to overcome this resistance is to 1) make assessment an integral part of the basic course design structure and 2) provide templates and standard procedures for the faculty to follow. Providing standard assessment procedures does not take away from faculty creativity and involvement in the assessment and continuous improvement process, it just focuses it on the most important items. The key is to communicate clearly the important information that must be collected for program assessment purposes, reducing time wasted by individual faculty thinking about the assessment process and allowing them to focus their time and creative energy on the design of the overall curriculum and the learning activities within the courses that will best help students to achieve the program outcomes. Use of a standardized backward course design process based on program and course outcomes can be very useful here. One example of outcomes-based course planning is given in "Understanding by Design". Even with a good outcomes-based course design instructors still have to evaluate student performance on the assessment activities for each outcome, but they get to spend most of their time on activities directly related to improving student learning rather than on individually developing procedures and protocols for collecting and evaluating assessment data. When properly implemented, a standardized backward course design process can actually increase creativity by providing a framework within which the faculty can creatively generate learning and assessment activities. This is in agreement with the anonymous quote that states: "standardization is the friend of creativity".
机译:结果评估最好是作为结束的手段,而不是目标。它是一种工具,意味着产生改进的学生学习(在学习的内容方面以及学习的程度),所以我们必须避免在评估中花费所有时间和能量的陷阱,而没有任何遗留改善学习所必需的变化。大多数教师员都已经过载教学,研究和服务责任,因此即使他们认为评估是一个有用的活动,他们通常会尽可能抵制它,以避免额外的工作量。克服这种阻力的关键是1)进行评估基础课程设计结构的组成部分,2)为教师提供模板和标准程序。提供标准评估程序并未从教师创造力带走并参与评估和持续改进过程,它只是将其集中在最重要的物品上。关键是明确地沟通必须收集的重要信息,以便进行计划评估目的,减少个人教师追求的时间追求评估过程,并允许他们将其时间和创造性能量集中在整体课程和学习活动的设计中在课程中,最好帮助学生实现计划结果。使用基于程序和课程结果的标准化后向课程设计过程可以非常有用。基于结果的课程规划的一个例子在“通过设计的理解”中给出。即使基于好的结果的课程设计,教练仍然必须在每个结果的评估活动中评估学生表现,但他们可以在与改善学生学习的直接相关的活动中度过大部分时间,而不是单独开发程序和协议收集和评估评估数据。当正确实施时,标准化的后向课程设计过程实际上可以通过提供一个框架来实现创造力,在该框架内,教师可以创造性地生成学习和评估活动。这与各国的匿名报价一致:“标准化是创造力的朋友”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号