首页> 外文会议>International Technology, Education and Development Conference >(1981) EXPERIENCES WITH INVERSION IN THE TEACHER/STUDENT ROLES IN “ECOLOGY” CLASSES
【24h】

(1981) EXPERIENCES WITH INVERSION IN THE TEACHER/STUDENT ROLES IN “ECOLOGY” CLASSES

机译:(1981年)在“生态学”课程中,在教师/学生角色中的反演

获取原文

摘要

In this paper the methodology used for the teaching of the subject of “ecology” in the EnvironmentalSciences degree at the Polytechnic School of Gandia (Valencia Polytechnic University) is exposed.The subject faces serious difficulties because it requires knowledge of other subjects. In addition, theprogram is broad, and it is imperative to acquire the knowledge necessary for further subjects(management and conservation of biotic and abiotic resources, environmental impact assessment,adaptation to climate change, etc.). All this represents a significant effort both for teachers andstudents. Although academic results were good, the retention capacity of the acquired knowledge wasnot satisfactory, so it was necessary to propose a change in the methodology. Conventionally thesubject had been taught with theoretical lectures.The methodological changes that have taken place in the classes were based on the inversion of therole of teachers and students.We decided to transform the inherent difficulty of the subject in an opportunity to learn to correlate thedifferent knowledge acquired, building more complex thoughts and approaches.The main objective is intended to enable students to achieve the integration of all abiotic and bioticcomponents in the definition of an ecosystem and to explain and predict natural processes and / oranthropogenic modifications. In terms of transversal skills effective communication, critical thinking,awareness of contemporary issues and specific instrumental competence were developed.Students were organized into different groups in order to prepare and give the classes of some of thetopics. Their teaching, supported by a PowerPoint or similar presentation, should consist of severalparts: a presentation of the concepts, exemplifications with explanation of scientific experiments,approach activities for the whole class and finally a set of questions and open answer to beundertaken by all students. The same presentations (once revised and amended) were the materialfor the assessment of the theoretical part of the subject.The evaluation was conducted in three ways: observations of learners in the classroom, results of theevaluations, and valuation of the knowledge acquired in courses of the following year.The main conclusions of this experience are: Teaching units with better results were as follows: lifecycles, population dynamics, distribution patterns, intraspecific competition, interspecific competition,predation and herbivory, and parasitism and symbiosis.The most successful classes were those that were developed using environmental interpretationtechniques. The topics were organised developing a script-argument, which was synthesized in a textwith the fundamental concepts raised in the introduction and completed in the final summary.The horizontal exchange has increased, but the teacher acts as mediator and guide. Even when thestudents organise the class, the teacher is still the class leader, and that was considered a positivefactor in the experience;;leadership is held together with increased accountability on the part ofstudents.Finally, we consider essential to leave a margin for personal choice: spontaneous establishment of thegroups, autonomy of choice in relation to the topic among those proposed and wide margin of freedomin relation to the methodology when giving the class, both in content and form.
机译:本文在甘地亚理工学院(瓦伦西亚理工学院)的“生态学”中的“生态学”学位教学的方法是暴露。主题面临严重的困难,因为它需要了解其他科目。此外,Program是广泛的,并且必须获得进一步受试者所需的知识(生物和非生物资源的管理和保护,环境影响评估,适应气候变化等)。这一切都代表了教师和特色的重要努力。虽然学术结果良好,但获得知识的保留能力不是令人满意的,因此有必要提出方法的变化。传统上表现出了理论讲座。在课堂上发生的方法改变是基于教师和学生的反演。我们决定改变主题的内在难度,以便学会相关的主题知识相关获得了,建立了更复杂的思想和方法。主要目标旨在使学生能够在生态系统的定义中实现所有非生物和生物组分的整合,并解释和预测自然过程和/ oranthopencoic修饰。就横向技能而言,开发了批判性思维,当代问题和特定工具能力的批判性思维,意识。组织成不同的群体,以便准备和给出一些阈值的课堂。他们的教学,由PowerPoint或类似的介绍支持,应由几个部分组成:概念的介绍,具有对科学实验的解释的举例,对整个阶级的方法以及最终通过所有学生的一系列问题和开放的答案。同样的陈述(一旦修订和修订)是对受试者理论部分的评估的材料。评估是以三种方式进行的:学习者在课堂上观察,观察结果,以及在课程中获得的知识的估值。这一年度的主要结论是:具有更好结果的教学单位如下:生命周期,人口动态,分发模式,内部竞争,种间竞争,捕食和草食病,以及寄生和共生。最成功的课程是那些使用环境解释技术开发。主题是组织开发一个脚本论证的剧本论点,该论证是在介绍中提出的基本概念和最终摘要中完成的基本概念。横向交易所增加,但教师担任调解员和指南。即使想象经济组织课堂,老师也仍然是阶级领导者,这被认为是体验中的积极因素;;领导力在众所周知的责任上举行。最后,我们认为是必要的个人选择留下保证金:自发地建立群组,在内容和表格中拟议和自由度的宽边缘与方法相关的主题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号