首页> 外文会议>International Technology, Education and Development Conference >(1105) STYLES OF LEADERSHIP OF HEADTEACHERS OF POLISH SCHOOLS OF DIFFERENT TYPES
【24h】

(1105) STYLES OF LEADERSHIP OF HEADTEACHERS OF POLISH SCHOOLS OF DIFFERENT TYPES

机译:(1105)不同类型波兰语学校校长领域的态度

获取原文

摘要

Leadership is undoubtedly a key factor contributing to the effectiveness of schools as organizationsand, what is even more important, to the educational achievements of students. The importance ofleadership has been recognised by the OECD, the European Commission and many educationalbodies at the national level in most European countries trying to implement educational reforms aimingat the improvement of school systems. Polish educational system can be shown as a good example ofsuch interest in educational leadership as the key element of school transformation. Recent changesin the area of school leaders development and training have been strongly focused on schoolleadership instead of (or in addition to) school management.At the same time we must notice that it is not clear how we should define leadership adequately to theneeds of educational organizations. Such a difficulty can be noticed both in educational leadershiptheory and practice where there are many different understandings of leadership. Starting from a shortreview of theories or paradigms of leadership, this paper tries to point out the way of understandingleadership that is the best from the perspective of education.To find out if this understanding is present in thinking of existing school head teachers, research wascarried out with the participation of a group of 150 head teachers of Polish schools of different types.They were asked to assess their style of leadership using the questionnaire based on Avery's (2004)typology of leadership paradigms (classical, transactional, visionary and organic). The paper presentsthe results of that study with special emphasis on differences in the understanding of leadershipbetween groups of head teachers of schools of different types: primary, lower secondary and uppersecondary. It also tries to present some recommendations for training and professional developmentof school heads based on the acquired results.
机译:领导毫无疑问是有助于学校作为组织的有效性的关键因素,对学生的教育成就更为重要。经合组织,欧洲委员会和许多在国立一级的大多数欧洲国家的知识产权的重要性得到了认可,这些国家在大多数欧洲国家旨在实施教育改革旨在改善学校系统。波兰教育制度可以作为对教育领导力的兴趣作为学校转型的关键要素。最近的变化在学校领导者领域的发展和培训已经强烈地专注于Schoolleadership,而不是(或除了)学校管理方面。同时我们必须注意到,我们不清楚我们如何为教育组织充分定义领导地位。在教育领导理论和实践中,可以注意到这种困难,在那里存在许多不同的领导地位。从领导力的理论或范例的速度开始,本文试图指出理解的方式,从教育的角度来看。发现这种理解是否存在于现有学校教师的思考中,研究丢弃了随着一群150名波兰语学校的不同类型的参与。他们被要求使用基于Avery(2004)的领导范式(经典,交易,有远见和有机)的问卷来评估他们的领导方式。本文介绍该研究的结果,特别强调了对不同类型的学校教师群体群体群体的理解的差异:小学,下次级和互补性。它还试图根据收购的结果提出培训和专业发展的一些建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号