首页> 外文会议>International Technology, Education and Development Conference >(899.pdf) AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF TEXT WRITTEN BY EFL LEARNERS BASED ON LINGUISTIC FEATURES AND LEARNER FEATURES
【24h】

(899.pdf) AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF TEXT WRITTEN BY EFL LEARNERS BASED ON LINGUISTIC FEATURES AND LEARNER FEATURES

机译:(899.pdf)基于语言特征和学习者功能的EFL学习者自动分类文本

获取原文

摘要

Automatic classification of text written by learners of English as a foreign language (EFL learners) canrelieve the burden placed on language teachers by reducing the time and effort required to evaluatethe text. In addition, language teachers can use classified text to extract linguistic knowledge that isimportant for EFL learners to know. One approach for automatic classification determines theappropriateness of text by examining linguistic features such as the distribution of adjectives, adverbs,nouns, and verb phrases, as these linguistic features are well-known evaluation criteria. However, thisapproach neglects learner features that indicate how EFL learners wrote the text in terms of the timespent writing and learners' confidence in the appropriateness of the text. These learner features arealso significant indicators of writing proficiency. Writing time indicates the difficulty of writing the textfor EFL learners, as more time is required to write more difficult text. Similarly, confidence is related todifficulty because EFL learners have less confidence in writing more difficult text. Given thisbackground, the present study constructed classification methods for text based on both linguisticfeatures and learner features. These methods were constructed using discriminant analysis. Theexplanatory variables were the linguistic features of the text and the learner features of writing timeand learner confidence. The objective variables were the integrated scores for the grammatical andsemantic correctness of the text. The experimental results showed that the tested methods had higheraccuracy than random chance in leave-one-out (k-fold) cross-validation tests: 71.1% for binaryclassification, 42.2% for five-group classification, and 28.9% for ten-group classification. Thus, weconcluded that these methods are useful for assisting language teachers in assessing theappropriateness of text written by EFL learners.KEnglish as a foreign language, writing proficiency, computer-assisted language learning,automatic classification.
机译:自动分类英语学习者作为外语(EFL学习者)通过减少评估文本所需的时间和精力来提取对语言教师的负担。此外,语言教师可以使用分类文本提取语言知识,即Elsimportants为EFL学习者了解。一种自动分类方法通过检查语言特征,例如形容词,副词,名词和动词短语的分布,因为这些语言特征是着名的评估标准,确定了文本的一种方法。然而,这个人忽略了学习者的特征,表明EFL学习者如何在时间表写作和学习者对文本的适当性方面写下文本。这些学习者特征是arealso写作熟练程度的重大指标。写作时间表示难以编写EFL学习者的难度,因为需要更多时间来编写更困难的文本。同样,信心是相关的,因为EFL学习者对写作更困难的文本的信心较少。鉴于本研究,本研究基于语言特征和学习者特征构建了文本的分类方法。使用判别分析构建这些方法。 Planplantoratory变量是文本的语言特征和写入Sugeand学习者信心的学习者功能。目标变量是文本的语法和义物正确性的综合分数。实验结果表明,测试方法比休假(K-FOL)交叉验证试验中的随机机会具有更高的疗程:71.1%用于二进制分类,五组分类42.2%,为10组分类为28.9% 。因此,这些方法是有助于协助语言教师评估EFL学习者编写的文本的表现为外语,写作熟练程度,计算机辅助语言学习,自动分类。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号