首页> 外文会议>Aunual Mary Kay O Connor Process Safety Center International Symposium >BEST PRACTICES FOR MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE (MOC) AND PRE START-UP SAFETY REVIEWS (PSSR)
【24h】

BEST PRACTICES FOR MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE (MOC) AND PRE START-UP SAFETY REVIEWS (PSSR)

机译:改变的最佳实践(MOC)和预启动安全评论(PSSR)

获取原文

摘要

Situation/Problem Since the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) implemented its Process Safety Management Program (PSM) in 1992, two elements; Management of Change (MOC) and Pre Start-up Safety Reviews (PSSR) continue to be two of the more challenging elements for companies to implement and maintain. These two elements alert and inform personnel that a process change is taking place, and that change has been looked at and reviewed by the relevant facility personnel. Pre Start-up Safety Review also ensures that the change, once completed but before startup or operation; 1. has been properly implemented, 2. with necessary documentation, including P&IDs and SOPs, updated, 3. and that affected personnel have been properly informed and trained on the changes. It takes diligent efforts of many working in concert to ensure that change is properly identified, analyzed, and executed in a quality and complete way. Conditions including large employee turnover, ever changing rules and regulations, overly worked or insufficiently trained personnel may hinder or make it hard to manage change and conduct Pre Start-up Safety Reviews efficiently and effectively. "We are not a PSM covered process," "It's an emergency situation," and "We are so far behind in our documentation, that it would take years to get caught up and complete" are some of the excuses given for why MOCs and PSSRs are not performed or completed. When skipped or not comprehensively managed, deficient MOCs and PSSRs, two of the very important elements in the PSM program, have led to catastrophic results and some of the biggest incidents at process facilities. Resolution/Problem MOCs and PSSRs are not just documentation and paperwork burdens performed for regulatory compliance. They are essential safety processes that require personnel and management to know and understand the chemical or manufacturing process and the hazards and risks involved in operating that process. They require knowledgeable and trained personnel to think through the process and be attentive on the job when a change needs to occur for production or safety reasons. As added bonuses, MOC and PSSRs are both excellent cost-effective process safety and business loss prevention tools for almost any business. Results This presentation will examine the rules for MOC and PSSR according to the OSHA 29 CFR 1910.119(1)(1) and OSHA 29 CFR 1910.119(i)(1) and (2) standards respectively and will also discuss some best practices and examples of appropriate documentation and forms for MOC and PSSRs, including a risk-based approach. Lessons Learned Improperly conducted or ignored MOCs and PSSRs have led to catastrophic events in industry. This presentation examines the elements of effective MOC and PSSR elements, their requirements according to the OSHA standard, best practices and examples of good documentation and forms. When properly conducted and applied, MOC and PSSR programs will help take both personnel and their companies from a hopefully compliant process safety management program to one of Process Safety Excellence.
机译:自职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)在1992年实施其流程安全管理计划(PSM)以来的情况/问题,两个要素;变更管理(MOC)和预先启动安全评论(PSSR)继续是公司实施和维护的两个更具挑战性的元素。这两个元素警报和通知人员正在进行过程变更,并通过相关设施人员查看并审查了这种变化。预先启动安全审查还确保改变,一旦完成,而且在启动或操作之前; 1.已妥善实施,2.具有必要的文件,包括P&ID和SOP,更新,3.并对受影响人员进行了正确通知和培训。努力努力,许多工作协同工作,以确保以质量和完整的方式妥善确定,分析和执行更改。包括大型员工营业额,不断变化的规则和规定,过度工作或不足的人员在内的条件可能会阻碍或使其难以管理变更,并有效地进行预先启动安全评论。 “我们不是诗篇流程,”“这是一个紧急情况,”和我们在我们的文档中落后于我们的落后,这将需要数年时间并完成“是为什么MOC和为什么的借口。 pssrs未执行或完成。当跳过或不受全面管理的,缺乏MOC和PSSR时,PSM计划中的两个非常重要的元素导致了灾难性的结果和一些最大的过程设施发生的事件。解决方案/问题MOCS和PSSR不仅仅是针对法规遵从性执行的文件和文书工作负担。它们是要求人员和管理的重要安全流程,以了解和理解化学或制造过程以及操作该过程所涉及的危险和风险。他们需要知识渊博和培训的人员通过该过程思考,并在生产或安全原因发生变化时注意工作。作为额外的奖金,MOC和PSSRS既具有出色的经济高效的过程安全性和商业损失预防工具,也是几乎任何业务。结果本演示文稿将根据OSHA 29 CFR 1910.119(1)(1)(1)和OSHA 29 CFR 1910.119(i)(1)和(2)标准来审查MOC和PSSR规则,并将讨论一些最佳做法和实例适当的MOC和PSSR的文件和表格,包括基于风险的方法。经验教训不正确地进行或忽视的MOC和PSSR已经导致行业的灾难性事件。本演示文稿介绍了有效的MOC和PSSR元素的要素,根据OSHA标准,最佳实践和良好文档和形式示例的要求。在适当进行和应用时,MOC和PSSR计划将有助于将人员及其公司从希望的符合条件的过程安全管理计划中取得有助于工艺系安全卓越之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号