首页> 外文会议>ESCAPE-20 >Fault Diagnosis in a Heat Exchanger using Process History Based-Methods
【24h】

Fault Diagnosis in a Heat Exchanger using Process History Based-Methods

机译:使用基于工艺历史的方法在热交换器中的故障诊断

获取原文

摘要

A comparison of fault diagnosis systems based on Dynamic Principal Component Analysis (DPCA) method and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) under the same experimental data is presented. Both approaches are process history based methods which do not assume any form of model structure, and rely only on process historical data. The comparative analysis shows the online performance of both approaches when sensors and/or actuators fail. Robustness, quick detection, isolability capacity, false alarm rates and multiple faults identifiability are considered for this experimental comparison. An industrial heat exchanger was the experimental system. ANN showed instantaneous detection for actuator faults; however, with greater (22%) false alarm rate. ANN can isolate multiple faults; whereas, DPCA did not show this property, but required a minor training effort.
机译:提出了基于动态主成分分析(DPCA)方法和人工神经网络(ANN)的故障诊断系统的比较。这两种方法都是基于过程的历史方法,其不承担任何形式的模型结构,并仅依赖于过程历史数据。比较分析显示了当传感器和/或执行器失败时两种方法的在线性能。鲁棒性,快速检测,隔离容量,假报警速率和多个故障可识别性被认为是针对这个实验比较。工业换热器是实验系统。安显示屏瞬时检测执行器故障;但是,更大(22%)误报率。安可以隔离多个故障;虽然,DPCA没有显示出这个财产,但需要一个小培训努力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号