首页> 外文会议>ESCAPE-20;European symposium on computer aided process engineering >Fault Diagnosis in a Heat Exchanger using Process History Based-Methods
【24h】

Fault Diagnosis in a Heat Exchanger using Process History Based-Methods

机译:基于过程历史的方法在换热器中的故障诊断

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A comparison of fault diagnosis systems based on Dynamic Principal ComponentrnAnalysis (DPCA) method and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) under the samernexperimental data is presented. Both approaches are process history based methodsrnwhich do not assume any form of model structure, and rely only on process historicalrndata. The comparative analysis shows the online performance of both approaches whenrnsensors and/or actuators fail. Robustness, quick detection, isolability capacity, falsernalarm rates and multiple faults identifiability are considered for this experimentalrncomparison. An industrial heat exchanger was the experimental system. ANN showedrninstantaneous detection for actuator faults; however, with greater (22%) false alarm rate.rnANN can isolate multiple faults; whereas, DPCA did not show this property, butrnrequired a minor training effort.
机译:提出了在相同实验数据下基于动态主成分分析(DPCA)方法和人工神经网络(ANN)的故障诊断系统的比较。两种方法都是基于过程历史的方法,它们不采用任何形式的模型结构,而仅依赖于过程历史数据。对比分析表明,当传感器和/或执行器发生故障时,两种方法的在线性能均不相同。该实验比较考虑了鲁棒性,快速检测,可隔离性,误报率和多个故障的可识别性。工业热交换器是实验系统。 ANN显示了对执行器故障的即时检测; rnANN可以隔离多个故障;然而,误报率更高(22%)。但是,DPCA没有显示此属性,而是需要进行少量的培训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号