首页> 外文会议>American Society for Mass Spectrometry Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics >Comparison of Two Sample Preparation Methods for Analyzing Pain Management Drugs in Urine
【24h】

Comparison of Two Sample Preparation Methods for Analyzing Pain Management Drugs in Urine

机译:两种样品制备方法的比较分析尿液疼痛管理药物

获取原文

摘要

1) Protein removal and depletion method is much faster and simpler than Sagacity HL SPE method. 2) Sagacity HL SPE method gave excellent recovery for all testing drugs; While Protein removal and depletion method gave relative good recovery for most analytes, but low recoveries for some very hydrophobic compounds. 3) We also evaluated both types of extraction method by DART-MS. In protein depletion and removal platefiltered samples, large quantities of other biological material were present, like creatine, which significantly interfered with the analysis and lowered the sensitivity of the method. Sagacity HL SPE method was designed to remove those very hydrophilic compounds, therefore there was very little interference from biological metabolites in the extracted samples.
机译:1)蛋白质去除和耗尽方法比脉星性HL SPE方​​法更快,更简单。 2)所萌发的HL SPE方​​法对所有测试药物提供了极好的恢复;虽然蛋白质去除和耗尽方法对大多数分析物具有相对良好的恢复,但对于一些非常疏水化合物,较低的回收率。 3)我们还通过DART-MS评估了两种类型的提取方法。在蛋白质耗尽和去除玻璃纤维样品中,存在大量的其​​他生物材料,如肌酸,这显着干扰了分析并降低了该方法的灵敏度。设计术后HL SPE方​​法以除去那些非常亲水化合物,因此在提取的样品中的生物代谢物干扰很小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号