首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis: An International Journal on All Drug-Related Topics in Pharmaceutical, Biomedical and Clinical Analysis >Comparison of ultrasound-enhanced air-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction and low-density solvent-based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction methods for determination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in human urine samples
【24h】

Comparison of ultrasound-enhanced air-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction and low-density solvent-based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction methods for determination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in human urine samples

机译:超声辅助气液微萃取与低密度溶剂型分散液微萃取方法测定人尿样中非甾体类抗炎药的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two dispersive-based liquid-liquid microextraction methods including ultrasound-enhanced air-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction (USE-AALLME) and low-density solvent-based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (LDS-DLLME) were compared for the extraction of salicylic acid (the hydrolysis product of acetylsalicylic acid), diclofenac and ibuprofen, as instances of the most commonly used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), in human urine prior to their determination by gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID). The influence of different parameters affecting the USE-AALLME (including type and volume of the extraction solvent, sample pH, ionic strength, and simultaneous sonication and number of extraction cycles) and the LDS-DLLME (including type and volume of the extraction and disperser solvents, sample pH, and ionic strength) were investigated to optimize their extraction efficiencies. Both methods are fast, simple and convenient with organic solvent consumption at mu L level. However, the best results were obtained using the USE-AALLME method, applying 30 mu L of 1-octanol as extraction solvent, 5.0 mL of sample at pH 3.0, without salt addition, and 5 extraction cycles during 20 s of sonication. This method was validated based on linearities (r(2) > 0.971), limits of detection (0.1-1.0 mu g L-1), linear dynamic ranges (0.4-1000.0 mu g L-1), enrichment factors (115 +/- 3-135 +/- 3), consumptive indices (0.043-0.037), inter- and intra-day precisions (4.3-4.8 and 5.6-6.1, respectively), and relative recoveries (94-103%). The USE-AALLME in combination with GC-FID, and with no need to derivatization step, was demonstrated to be a simple, inexpensive, sensitive and efficient method to determine NSAIDs in human urine samples. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:比较了超声增强气辅助液-液微萃取(USE-AALLME)和低密度溶剂基-分散液-液微萃取(LDS-DLLME)两种分散基液-液微萃取法提取水杨酸的方法。 (乙酰水杨酸的水解产物),双氯芬酸和布洛芬,作为最常用的非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)的实例,在人尿中,然后通过气相色谱-火焰电离检测(GC-FID)测定。不同参数对USE-AALLME(包括萃取溶剂的类型和体积,样品pH,离子强度以及同时超声处理和萃取循环次数)和LDS-DLLME(包括萃取和分散器的类型和体积)的影响研究了溶剂,样品的pH值和离子强度),以优化其提取效率。两种方法都快速,简单和方便,并且有机溶剂的消耗量为μL。但是,使用USE-AALLME方法可获得最佳结果,在超声处理20 s的过程中,使用30μL的1-辛醇作为提取溶剂,5.0 mL的pH 3.0样品(不添加盐)和5个提取循环。该方法基于线性(r(2)> 0.971),检测限(0.1-1.0μg L-1),线性动态范围(0.4-1000.0μg L-1),富集因子(115 + /)进行了验证-3-135 +/- 3),消费指数(0.043-0.037),日间和日内精度(分别为4.3-4.8和5.6-6.1)和相对回收率(94-103%)。 USE-AALLME与GC-FID结合使用且无需衍生化步骤,被证明是一种测定人尿液样品中NSAID的简单,廉价,灵敏且有效的方法。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号