首页> 外文会议>SPIE Conference on Advances in Resist Materials and Processing Technology >Quantitative measurement of resist outgassing during exposure
【24h】

Quantitative measurement of resist outgassing during exposure

机译:暴露过程中抗蚀剂分散的定量测量

获取原文

摘要

Determination of both the identity and quantity of species desorbing from photoresists during exposure at anywavelength – 248nm, 193nm and EUV – has proved to be very challenging, adding considerable uncertainty to theevaluation of risks posed by specific photoresists to exposure tool optics. Measurements using a variety of techniques forgas detection and solid film analysis have been reported but analytical results have not in general been easy to compareor even in apparent agreement, in part due to difficulties in establishing absolute calibrations. In this work we describetwo measurement methods that can be used for any exposure wavelength, and show that they provide self-consistentquantitative outgassing data for 2 all-organic and 2 Si-containing 193 nm resists. The first method, based upon gascollection, uses two primary chromatographic techniques. Organic products containing C, S and Si are determined bycollection of vapors emitted during exposure in a cold trap and analysis by Gas Chromatography-Flame IonizationDetector-Pulsed Flame Photometric Detector-Mass Spectrometry (GC-FID-PFPD-MS). Inorganic products such as SO2are identified by adsorbent bed with analysis by Gas Particle-Ion Chromatography (GP-IC). The calibration procedureused provides reasonable accuracy without exhaustive effort. The second method analyzes the elemental concentrationsin resist films before and after exposure by secondary ion mass spectrometry technique (SIMS), which requires onlyknowledge of the resist compositions to be quantitative. The extent of outgassing of C and S determined by the twomethods is in good agreement for all 4 resists, especially when taking their fundamentally different characters intoaccount. Overall, the gas collection techniques yielded systematically lower outgassing numbers than did SIMS, and theorigins of the spread in values, which likely bracket the true values, as well as detection limits will be discussed. Thedata for Si were found to differ significantly, however, and we show that the discrepancy is due to photo-inducedreactions at the polymer surface with the gas atmosphere present above the resist during exposure. For example,photolytic oxidation of the C-Si bonds in air causes volatile Si-containing products to be formed from an otherwise stablepolymer, showing it is important to take the gas environment during exposure into account when designing resistpolymers for low Si outgassing.
机译:在任何波长 - 248nm,193nm和Euv曝光期间,从光致抗蚀剂中解吸的物种的身份和数量的测定是非常具有挑战性的,对特定光致抗蚀剂造成的风险评估增加了相当大的不确定性,以暴露工具光学器件。已经报告了使用各种技术的测量结果检测和实心薄膜分析,但即使在明显的协议中,分析结果也没有易于比较,部分原因是建立绝对校准的困难。在这项工作中,我们描述了可用于任何曝光波长的测量方法,并表明它们为2个全体有机和含2 Si的193nm抗蚀剂提供自给自足的分散数据。基于气体孔的第一种方法使用两个主要色谱技术。含有C的有机产品,S和Si是在冷阱中,并分析通过气相色谱 - 火焰IonizationDetector-脉冲火焰光度检测器 - 质谱法(GC-FID-PFPD-MS)曝光期间发射蒸气的确定bycollection。无机产品,如SO2通过吸附床鉴定,通过气体颗粒 - 离子色谱(GP-IC)分析。校准所使用的校准可用于无需详尽努力,提供合理的准确性。第二种方法通过二次离子质谱技术(SIMS)在暴露之前和之后分析元素浓度抗蚀剂膜,其仅需要仅仅是定量的抗蚀剂组合物。由Twomethods决定的C和S的分配程度对所有4个抗拒均匀,特别是在从根本上不同的角色达到时。总体而言,气体收集技术产生系统性低于确实SIMS脱气号码,并在值蔓延,这可能支架的真正价值,以及检测限将要讨论的theorigins。然而,发现Si的TheData显着不同,并且我们表明差异是由于聚合物表面的光诱导,气体气氛在暴露过程中抗蚀剂上方。例如,空气中C-Si键的光解氧化导致含挥发性的Si待由其他稳定的聚合物形成,表明当在设计低Si除气时,在曝光期间服用气体环境是重要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号