首页> 外文会议>Asian Society for Cardiovascular Surgery >Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Thoracic Esophageal Carcinoma Between Two Referral Centers in Japan and China
【24h】

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Thoracic Esophageal Carcinoma Between Two Referral Centers in Japan and China

机译:日本和中国两个推荐中心之间的胸部食管癌外科癌症的比较

获取原文

摘要

Introduction: Comparison was made between two referral centers, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital (SCC) in Japan and Shnghai Chest Hospital (SCH) in China. Methods: A total of 97 patients (47 from SCC and 50 from SCH) of thoracic esophagus treated by surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Results: SCC preferred three-field lymphadenectomy, on the other hand, SCH did two-field. Morbidity rate in SCC was higher than in SCH. There were no significant differences in gender, clinical stage, mortality, residual tumor and accuracy of preo-perative staging. Conclusions: Three-field lymphadenectomy may cause more complications compared with two-field lymphadenectomy. To clarify the differences of surgery, the analysis of long-term survival rates are needed.
机译:介绍:在中国和山海胸部医院(SCC)在中国的两个推荐中心之间进行了比较。方法:回顾性审查了通过手术治疗的胸部食管共有97名患者(来自SCC和SCH)的患者(SCC和50例)。结果:SCC优选的三场淋巴结切除术,另一方面,SCH做了两场。 SCC的发病率高于SCH。性别,临床阶段,死亡率,残留肿瘤和促进阶段的准确性没有显着差异。结论:与双场淋巴结切除术相比,三场淋巴结切除术可能导致更多的并发症。为了澄清手术的差异,需要分析长期存活率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号