首页> 外文会议>Annual International Meeting of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers >Real-time Moisture Measurement on a Forage Harvester using Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy
【24h】

Real-time Moisture Measurement on a Forage Harvester using Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy

机译:使用近红外反射光谱法的饲料收割机实时湿度测量

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A mobile, diode array NIR spectrometer was integrated into the spout of a self-propelled forage harvester to measure crop moisture. Spectra and moisture reference samples were collected in 2004 and 2005 for the development of static (in-lab) and dynamic (on-harvester) moisture calibrations. Moisture prediction models for whole-plant-corn-silage (WPCS) developed using static data had a root mean standard error of cross validation (RMSECV) of 1.12% using five principle components (PCs) while a calibration developed using dynamic data had a RMSECV of 3.28% using four PCs. Alfalfa validation results produced RMSECVs of 2.50% using four PCs and 3.74% using three PCs for models using static and dynamic data, respectively. Dynamic data were predicted withcalibrations developed using static data with similar error but more spectral information was required. A static alfalfa model predicted dynamic data with a root mean standard error of prediction (RMSEP) of 3.41% using three PCs compared to the dynamic model's RMSECV of 3.74% using three PCs. Similar trends were found with WPCS models. Predicting data independent of type of crop resulted in the utilization of more PCs but with higher RMSEPs than the cross validation results of predicted dataset. The sensor and associated calibrations were able to predict forage moisture well, although more diverse data and further calibration development is needed to improve sensor accuracy to the desired range of +- 2 percentage units.
机译:移动式二极管阵列NIR光谱仪被整合到自推进牧草收割机的喷口中以测量作物水分。 2004年和2005年收集光谱和水分参考样品,用于开发静态(实验室)和动态(在Harvester)水分校准。使用静态数据开发的全植物玉米青贮饲料(WPC)的湿度预测模型在使用五个原理组件(PCS)的同时,使用5个原理组件(PCS)具有1.12%的横向验证(RMSECV)的根平均值误差,而使用动态数据开发的校准具有RMSECV使用四个PCS的3.28%。 Alfalfa验证结果使用四个PC使用三个PC使用静态和动态数据的模型使用四个PC和3.74%的RMSECV。预测使用具有类似误差的静态数据开发的动态数据,但需要更多的光谱信息。与使用三个PC的动态模型的RMSECV相比,静态苜蓿模型预测了3.41%的预测(RMSEP)的均线标准误差为3.41%,使用3个PC。 WPCS模型发现了类似的趋势。预测无关的数据无关,导致使用更多PC但具有比预测数据集的交叉验证结果更高的RMSEP。传感器和相关校准能够良好地预测饲料湿度,尽管需要更多样化的数据和进一步的校准开发来提高传感器精度,以提高到所需的+ - 2个百分点单元。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号