首页> 外文会议>IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education >COMPARING COMPUTER-BASED INSTRUCTION, PRESCHOOL INSTRUCTION, AND SUPPLEMANTRY READING MATERIAL
【24h】

COMPARING COMPUTER-BASED INSTRUCTION, PRESCHOOL INSTRUCTION, AND SUPPLEMANTRY READING MATERIAL

机译:基于计算机的指令,学前教育和辅助阅读材料比较

获取原文

摘要

This study examined difference in children's scores as a function of the type of intervention they received. There were 218 preschool children who participated in one of three intervention groups: computer-based instruction plus supplementary reading material, traditional preschool instruction, and supplementary reading material only. Children were tested prior to and after treatment, and their improvement scores were compared. Results indicate that children in the computer-based instruction group improved their skills in phonological awareness, in reading words recognition, and in letter recognition significantly more compared to children in the traditional preschool instruction and to children in the supplementary reading material groups. Interestingly, children in the traditional preschool instruction and in the supplementary reading material group improved their vocabulary significantly more than the computer-based instruction group.
机译:本研究检查了儿童分数的差异,作为他们收到的干预类型的函数。有218名学龄前儿童参加了三个干预组中的一个:基于计算机的指示加上补充阅读材料,传统的学龄前教学和补充阅读材料。在治疗之前和之后进行过患儿,比较它们的改善评分。结果表明,基于计算机的教学组中的儿童在阅读词语识别方面提高了语音意识的技能,与传统的学龄前教学中的儿童和补充读数材料组中的儿童相比,信识别更高。有趣的是,传统的学龄前教学和补充阅读材料组中的儿童比基于计算机的指令组更加显着改善了他们的词汇量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号