首页> 外文会议>International Symposium on Microelectronics >Cost Comparison of Temporary Bond and Debond Methods For Thin Wafer Handling
【24h】

Cost Comparison of Temporary Bond and Debond Methods For Thin Wafer Handling

机译:薄晶圆处理临时债券和借方方法的成本比较

获取原文

摘要

Miniaturization and increased performance demands are driving the industry to explore 2.5D and 3D packaging. Although progress has been made in recent years, many barriers remain. One primary cost driver for 2.5D and 3D processes is the temporary bond and debond method used for thin wafer handling. Various solutions are appearing on the market, but there is not a single method taking the lead as the obvious best choice. Many factors must be considered when looking at the total cost of a thin wafer handling solution. In this paper, we will use cost modeling to carry out detailed cost and yield trade-offs for temporary bond and debond methods. Instead of concentrating on one proposed solution that is available on the market, we will analyze a range of solutions, focusing on variables such as tool cost, material cost, throughput, yield, and interposer cost. With this analysis, we will determine the most significant cost drivers within the temporary bond and debond process and propose process details for a reasonable solution.
机译:小型化和增加的性能要求正在推动行业探索2.5D和3D包装。虽然近年来取得了进展,但仍有许多障碍。用于2.5D和3D流程的一个主要成本驱动程序是用于薄晶片处理的临时键合和借助方法。各种解决方案出现在市场上,但没有一种方法是作为明显的最佳选择。在查看薄晶片处理解决方案的总成本时,必须考虑许多因素。在本文中,我们将使用成本建模来进行临时债券和禁止方法的详细成本和收益权衡。我们将分析一系列解决方案,而不是专注于市场上可用的一个提出的解决方案,而是专注于工具成本,材料成本,吞吐量,产量和插入成本等变量。通过此分析,我们将确定临时债券和借方流程中最重要的成本司机,并提出合理解决方案的流程细节。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号