首页> 外文会议>Annual Frontiers in Education >A comparison of the role of academic dishonesty policies of several colleges on the cheating behavior of engineering and pre-engineering students
【24h】

A comparison of the role of academic dishonesty policies of several colleges on the cheating behavior of engineering and pre-engineering students

机译:若干大学学术不诚实政策对工程与预工程前学生作弊行为的比较

获取原文

摘要

While universities take a variety of approaches in dealing with academic dishonesty, current evidence suggests that institutions with honor codes have a significantly lower level of self-reported cheating as compared to non-honor code institutions. This paper focuses on five institutions and their effectiveness in dealing with cheating, specifically among engineering or pre-engineering students. Our goal is to provide greater understanding of what institutional approaches appear to be most effective in minimizing cheating among this specific sub-group. The paper presents a predictive model of the extent of cheating among engineering students at these institutions using a variety of variables, including the nature of the academic policies at the study institutions, student perceptions toward cheating on their campuses and other [f9]contextual variables. Results appear to indicate that the strongest predictor of increased cheating among this sample [f2]of engineering students was the sense that cheating was necessary to succeed. Other variables that made a significant impact were the presence of an honor code and membership in a fraternity or sorority.
机译:虽然大学在处理学术不诚实方面采取各种方法,但目前的证据表明,与非荣誉码机构相比,荣誉法规的机构具有明显较低的自我报告作弊水平。本文侧重于五个机构及其在处理作弊,特别是工程或预工程学生之间的有效性。我们的目标是提供更多地理解机构方法在最小化这一特定子集团之间的作弊方面最有效的方法。本文介绍了使用各种变量在这些机构的工程学生作弊范围的预测模型,包括学习机构的学术政策的性质,学生对欺骗其校园和其他[F9]语境变量的认识。结果似乎表明,在工程学生的这个样本[F2]中增加了作弊的最强预测因子是欺骗性是成功所必需的。其他变量产生重大影响的变量是在兄弟会或姐妹中存在荣誉典礼和会员资格。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号