首页> 外文会议>IFAC World Congress >Do the Cubature and Unscented Kalman Filtering Methods Outperform Always the Extended Kalman Filter?
【24h】

Do the Cubature and Unscented Kalman Filtering Methods Outperform Always the Extended Kalman Filter?

机译:Cubature和Uncented Kalman过滤方法是否总是始终扩展的卡尔曼滤波器?

获取原文

摘要

This paper elaborates three well-known state estimators, which are used extensively in practice. These are the classical continuous-discrete extended Kalman filter (EKF) and the continuous-discrete cubature Kalman filtering (CKF) and unscented Kalman filtering (UKF) algorithms designed recently. Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that the contemporary filters always outperform the traditional EKF in the accuracy of state estimation because of their higher-order approximation of the mean of propagated Gaussian density in the time- and measurement-update steps of the modern techniques. However, the present paper specifies this commonly accepted opinion and shows that despite the mentioned theoretical fact the EKF may outperform the CKF and UKF methods in the accuracy of state estimation when the stochastic system under consideration exposes a stiff behavior. That is why stiff stochastic models are difficult to deal with and require effective state estimation algorithms to be devised yet.
机译:本文阐述了三种众所周知的状态估计,在实践中广泛使用。这些是经典连续离散扩展卡尔曼滤波器(EKF)和最近设计的连续离散Cucature Kalman滤波(CKF)和Unscented Kalman滤波(UKF)算法。如今,通常接受当代滤波器总是在状态估计的准确性方面优于传统的EKF,因为它们在现代技术的时间和测量更新步骤中传播的高斯密度的平均值的高度近似。然而,本文规定了这一普遍接受的意见,并表明,尽管所提到的理论事实,EKF可能在所考虑的随机系统暴露僵硬的行为时,EKF可能以达到的状态估计的准确性更优于CKF和UKF方法。这就是为什么僵硬的随机模型难以处理,需要有效的状态估计算法设计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号