首页> 外文会议>IEEE Congress on Information Science and Technology >Learners'Motivation Types in the Smart Instruction of English for Specific Purposes
【24h】

Learners'Motivation Types in the Smart Instruction of English for Specific Purposes

机译:学习者在英语的智能指令中的语法类型,以特定目的

获取原文

摘要

The paper introduces results of research in which potential increase in learner's knowledge is considered from the view of four motivation types (Accurators, Coordinators, Directors, Explorers) within the process of smart instruction applied at two topics (Career Development, Healthy Living) of the English for Specific Purposes course. The main research objective is to find out whether learners of all motivation types can succeed in this process. Totally, 119 students, prospective teachers from the Faculty of Education and Faculty of Science, participated in the research. The SAMR (Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, Redefinition) model was applied within the smart instruction using smart devices to approach electronic sources and smart methods towards acquiring the learning content. The smart instruction was conducted for 12 weeks (one semester). Two hypotheses were set, and the quasi-experiment and ex-post-facto method were applied. Data referring to learners' motivation types were collected through the standardized Motivation Type Inventory (MTI) by Plaminek. The increase in learners' knowledge was calculated as the difference between entrance and final didactic tests scores. The results did not show statistically significant difference between single motivation types in the topic of Career Development. However, in Healthy Living, the difference was discovered in the group of Coordinators compared to other three types.
机译:本文介绍了学习者知识的潜在增加的研究结果,从两个主题(职业发展,健康生活)的智能指导过程中的四种动机类型(准确性,协调员,董事,探险家)中审议了学习者知识的潜在增加。特定目的英语课程。主要研究目标是找出所有动机类型的学习者是否可以在此过程中取得成功。完全,119名学生,来自科学教育部的前瞻性教师,参加了研究。使用智能设备在智能指令中应用SAMR(替换,增强,修改,重新定义)模型,以接近电子来源和智能方法来获取学习内容。智能指令进行了12周(一个学期)。设定了两个假设,并施加了准实验和事实上的方法。通过Plaminek通过标准化动机类型库存(MTI)收集参考学习者的动机类型的数据。学习者知识的增加被计算为入口和最终教学测试分数之间的差异。结果在职业发展主题中的单一动机类型之间没有显示出统计学上的差异。然而,在健康生活中,与其他三种类型相比,该协调员组中发现了差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号