首页> 外文会议>IFIP WG 8.6 international conference on transfer and diffusion of IT >Searching the Identity of Information Systems: A Study from Interdisciplinary Contexts
【24h】

Searching the Identity of Information Systems: A Study from Interdisciplinary Contexts

机译:搜索信息系统的身份:跨学科环境的研究

获取原文

摘要

Purpose: The present paper addresses the problem of the information systems (IS) identity, in particular it makes an attempt to identify the intellectual causes that hinder the research about the core of IS and suggests how to remove them. Design/methodology/approach: Authors who argue on the cultural core of IS sometimes relate this argument to the 'reference disciplines' of IS such as economics and sociology. Authors rarely examine what happens in parallel domains of knowledge usually labeled as 'cognate disciplines' of IS. We fixed to extend inquiries on the close domains, in particular we have analyzed the literature of artificial intelligence, information retrieval, medical informatics, digital humanities and software engineering. Findings: Bibliographical evidence shows how these disciplines struggle with the 'identity crisis' as IS do; more precisely thinkers share non-trivial difficulties when they argue about broad topics connected to the information technology such as the possibilities and limits of computer systems, the transfer and diffusion of technology etc. Research implications: We recall how normally philosophy and science progress side to side and cooperate. Instead, the modern literature shows how computer science illustrates all the technical details but does not provide effective explanations to philosophers of post-computation disciplines. Several narrow theories underpin computer systems that prove to be futile to thinkers who address broad arguments. An apparent cause-effect relationship emerges between the fragmentary notions of computer science and the current 'identity crisis' of IS and cognate disciplines. Originality/value: This study leads to a ground-breaking conclusion. In the first stage, the solution to the identity problem should not be searched inside IS but outside. Secondly as soon as possible noteworthy efforts should be made in order to improve the theoretical basis of informatics. More precisely computing theorists should develop a unified cultural frame or, at least, should make significant progress toward this direction.
机译:目的:本文解决了信息系统的问题(是)身份的问题,特别是它试图确定阻碍了关于核心的研究的知识原因并提出了如何删除它们。设计/方法论/方法:争论文化核心的作者有时会将这种论证与经济学和社会学的“参考学科”相关联。作者很少检查通常被标记为“同源学科”的并行知识域中发生的事情。我们修复了在密切域名的询问,特别是我们分析了人工智能,信息检索,医学信息学,数字人文和软件工程的文献。调查结果:书目证据表明,这些学科如何与“身份危机”一样努力;更准确的思想家在争论与计算机系统的可能性和限制等信息技术相关的广泛主题时,思考人员争夺非琐碎的困难,转让和扩散等等研究意义:我们回顾了如何通常是如何哲学和科学进步方面的方式一边并合作。相反,现代文献展示了计算机科学如何说明所有技术细节,而且没有为后计算后学科的哲学家提供有效的解释。几种狭窄的理论支撑计算机系统,该系统被证明对解决广泛论据的思想家徒劳无功。计算机科学的零售概念与当前“身份危机”的局部概念与同源学科之间出现的明显造成关系。原创/价值:本研究导致接地结论。在第一阶段,内部不应搜索身份问题的解决方案是外面。其次,尽快应注意,应努力提高信息学的理论基础。更精确计算理论家应该制定统一的文化框架,或者至少应该对这个方向取得重大进展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号