首页> 外文会议>ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition >COMPARING TRANSPARENT DEVICES TO CURRENT EDUCATIONAL METHODS FOR ENHANCING COMPREHENSION OF PRODUCT FUNCTIONALITY
【24h】

COMPARING TRANSPARENT DEVICES TO CURRENT EDUCATIONAL METHODS FOR ENHANCING COMPREHENSION OF PRODUCT FUNCTIONALITY

机译:将透明设备与当前的教育方法进行比较以增强对产品功能的理解

获取原文

摘要

Mechanical dissection has become a popular method for introducing engineering students to design. However, there are many factors preventing mechanical dissection from becoming widespread. We propose an alternative to mechanical dissection focused on functionality. Transparent devices are modified devices that allow students to inspect the internal components while it is operating. To test the effectiveness of transparent devices, we compared a diagram to a dissected and a transparent device. The devices were presented to university students. After being allowed to inspect an opaque device and supplementary material, students were asked how the device functions and their confidence level. They were scored based on how correct their answers were. We found that both dissected and transparent devices were more effective in increasing comprehension and confidence than the diagram. There was little difference between dissected and transparent devices. The transparent device did produce a better correlation between correctness and confidence.
机译:机械解剖已经成为将工程专业的学生介绍给设计的一种流行方法。但是,有许多因素阻碍了机械解剖的普及。我们提出了一种专注于功能性的机械解剖的替代方法。透明设备是经过修改的设备,使学生可以在运行时检查内部组件。为了测试透明设备的有效性,我们将图表与解剖的透明设备进行了比较。这些设备已提交给大学生。在被允许检查不透明的设备和补充材料后,学生被问及该设备如何工作以及其置信度。根据答案的正确性对他们打分。我们发现,剖析和透明的设备都比图表更有效地提高了理解力和置信度。解剖的设备与透明的设备之间几乎没有什么区别。透明设备确实在正确性和置信度之间产生了更好的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号