首页> 外文会议>ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition >COMPARING TRANSPARENT DEVICES TO CURRENT EDUCATIONAL METHODS FOR ENHANCING COMPREHENSION OF PRODUCT FUNCTIONALITY
【24h】

COMPARING TRANSPARENT DEVICES TO CURRENT EDUCATIONAL METHODS FOR ENHANCING COMPREHENSION OF PRODUCT FUNCTIONALITY

机译:将透明装置与当前教育方法进行比较,提高产品功能的理解

获取原文

摘要

Mechanical dissection has become a popular method for introducing engineering students to design. However, there are many factors preventing mechanical dissection from becoming widespread. We propose an alternative to mechanical dissection focused on functionality. Transparent devices are modified devices that allow students to inspect the internal components while it is operating. To test the effectiveness of transparent devices, we compared a diagram to a dissected and a transparent device. The devices were presented to university students. After being allowed to inspect an opaque device and supplementary material, students were asked how the device functions and their confidence level. They were scored based on how correct their answers were. We found that both dissected and transparent devices were more effective in increasing comprehension and confidence than the diagram. There was little difference between dissected and transparent devices. The transparent device did produce a better correlation between correctness and confidence.
机译:机械解剖已成为引入工程学生设计的流行方法。然而,有许多因素阻止了机械解剖变得普遍。我们提出了一种替代于功能的机械解剖。透明设备是修改的设备,允许学生在运行时检查内部组件。为了测试透明装置的有效性,我们将图与解剖和透明装置进行了比较。这些设备呈到大学生。在允许检查不透明装置和补充材料后,学生被问到设备如何运作及其置信水平。他们基于对答案的纠正程度进行得分。我们发现,解剖和透明装置在越来越多的理解和比图中更有效。解剖和透明装置之间几乎没有差异。透明装置确实在正确性和置信度之间产生更好的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号