首页> 外文会议>IPC apex expo conference exhibition >Reliability Assessment of No-clean and Water-soluble Solder Pastes Part Ⅰ
【24h】

Reliability Assessment of No-clean and Water-soluble Solder Pastes Part Ⅰ

机译:免清洗和水溶性焊膏的可靠性评估第一部分

获取原文

摘要

Looking back twenty-five years ago, the solder pastes residues had to be cleaned after reflow due to their corrosive nature: two ways of cleaning were possible, either with solvent or by using water, with or without detergent. Now the assembly world is mainly no-clean: paste formulation is safer in terms of chemical reliability and process costs are reduced without cleaning. However, some applications, i.e. military, aerospace, high frequency, semiconductor require a perfect elimination of the residue after reflow. There are several options to achieve this result: the use of a no-clean paste which residue can be removed with the most suitable cleaning method or the use of a paste designed to be cleaned, as a water-soluble solder paste. The water-soluble solder pastes generally show great wettability because of their strong activation but they are also known to have shorter stencil life and to be more sensitive to working conditions as temperature and humidity, compared to the no-clean pastes. Additionally, with the components stand-off getting smaller and smaller, washing residues with water only is more and more challenging due to its high surface tension: the addition of detergent becomes often necessary. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the differences between these two families of solder pastes to guide users in their choice. This will be achieved through the comparison of several recent water-soluble and no-clean formulations as far as reliability is concerned. First the printing quality will be evaluated (viscosity, tack, cold slump, printing speed according to pressure, stencil life, idle time, printing consistency). Then the reflow properties will be compared (hot slump, solderballing, reflow process window, wetting ability on different finishes). Finally the residue cleanability will be assessed. The IPC SIR test (method IPC TM 650 2.6.3.7) will be also done to conclude the study. Both standardized tests and production tests will be used to evaluate the performance of these two kinds of solder pastes.
机译:回顾二十五年前,由于其腐蚀性,焊膏残留物必须在回流后进行清洗:两种清洗方法都是可行的,无论是使用溶剂还是使用水,有或没有洗涤剂。现在的组装世界主要是免清洗的:从化学可靠性的角度来看,焊膏配方更安全,无需清洗即可降低加工成本。但是,某些应用,例如军事,航空航天,高频半导体,需要在回流后完全消除残留物。有几种方法可以达到此效果:使用免清洗焊膏(可以通过最适合的清洗方法去除残留物)或使用设计为清洗的焊膏(作为水溶性焊膏)。水溶性焊膏由于具有很强的活化性,因此通常具有很高的润湿性,但与免清洗焊膏相比,它们的模板寿命更短,并且对温度和湿度等工作条件更加敏感。此外,随着组件的间距越来越小,由于其高表面张力,仅用水洗涤残留物变得越来越具有挑战性:经常需要添加洗涤剂。本文的目的是强调这两种焊膏系列之间的差异,以指导用户进行选择。就可靠性而言,这将通过比较几种最新的水溶性和免清洗配方来实现。首先将评估印刷质量(粘度,粘性,冷坍落度,根据压力的印刷速度,模版寿命,空转时间,印刷一致性)。然后将比较回流特性(热坍落度,锡球形成,回流工艺窗口,不同表面处理的润湿能力)。最后,将评估残留物的清洁性。还将完成IPC SIR测试(方法IPC TM 650 2.6.3.7)以结束研究。标准化测试和生产测试都将用于评估这两种焊膏的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号