【24h】

Comparison of two generalized logistic regression models; a case study

机译:两种广义逻辑回归模型的比较;案例研究

获取原文

摘要

Two generalized logistic regression models were compared on a set of observations describing persons with mental disabilities. The main variable of interest (willingness of the parents to incorporate their mentally handicapped offspring into on-farm activities) has three different values (no, undecided, yes). These values can be regarded as unordered (the variable having nominal measurement scale) or as ordered (the variable having ordinal measurement scale). Nominal and ordinal logistic regression models were used to analyze the impact of several predictors on the main variable of interest. We compare the two models in terms of the likelihood ratio test and the Nagelkerke coefficient of determination. It turns out that the ordinal regression assumptions are often not met. In our case, the nominal regression model has proved preferable to the ordinal regression one.
机译:在一组描述智障人士的观察结果上,比较了两个广义的逻辑回归模型。感兴趣的主要变量(父母是否愿意将弱智的后代纳入农场活动)具有三个不同的值(否,不确定,是)。这些值可以视为无序的(具有标称测量标度的变量)或有序的(具有标称测量标度的变量)。名义和顺序逻辑回归模型用于分析几个预测变量对主要变量的影响。我们根据似然比检验和Nagelkerke决定系数比较了两个模型。事实证明,通常无法满足序数回归的假设。在我们的案例中,名义回归模型被证明比有序回归模型更可取。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号