首页> 外文期刊>Decision Sciences >A Decision Support Tool for Predicting Patients at Risk of Readmission: A Comparison of Classification Trees, Logistic Regression, Generalized Additive Models, and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines
【24h】

A Decision Support Tool for Predicting Patients at Risk of Readmission: A Comparison of Classification Trees, Logistic Regression, Generalized Additive Models, and Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines

机译:用于预测有再入院风险的患者的决策支持工具:分类树,逻辑回归,广义加性模型和多元自适应回归样条的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The number of emergency (or unplanned) readmissions in the United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS) has been rising for many years. This trend, which is possibly related to poor patient care, places financial pressures on hospitals and on national healthcare budgets. As a result, clinicians and key decision makers (e.g., managers and commissioners) are interested in predicting patients at high risk of readmission. Logistic regression is the most popular method of predicting patient-specific probabilities. However, these studies have produced conflicting results with poor prediction accuracies. We compared the predictive accuracy of logistic regression with that of regression trees for predicting emergency readmissions within 45 days after been discharged from hospital. We also examined the predictive ability of two other types of data-driven models: generalized additive models (GAMs) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS). We used data on 963 patients readmitted to hospitals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. We used repeated split-sample validation: the data were divided into derivation and validation samples. Predictive models were estimated using the derivation sample and the predictive accuracy of the resultant model was assessed using a number of performance measures, such as area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in the validation sample. This process was repeated 1,000 times-the initial data set was divided into derivation and validation samples 1,000 times, and the predictive accuracy of each method was assessed each tiine. The mean ROC curve area for the regression tree models in the 1,000 derivation samples was .928, while the mean ROC curve area of a logistic regression model was .924. Our study shows that logistic regression model and regression trees had performance comparable to that of more flexible, data-driven models such as GAMs and MARS. Given that the models have produced excellent predictive accuracies, this could be a valuable decision support tool for clinicians (healthcare managers, policy makers, etc.) for informed decision making in the management of diseases, which ultimately contributes to improved measures for hospital performance management.
机译:多年来,英国国家卫生局(NHS)紧急(或计划外)再入院的人数一直在增加。这种趋势可能与患者护理不佳有关,给医院和国家医疗保健预算带来了财务压力。结果,临床医生和关键决策者(例如,经理和专员)对预测高再入院风险的患者很感兴趣。 Logistic回归是预测患者特定概率的最流行方法。但是,这些研究产生的结果相互矛盾,预测准确性较差。我们将逻辑回归与回归树的预测准确性进行比较,以预测出院后45天内的紧急再入院率。我们还检查了其他两种类型的数据驱动模型的预测能力:广义加性模型(GAM)和多元自适应回归样条(MARS)。我们使用了963例重新入院的慢性阻塞性肺疾病和哮喘患者的数据。我们使用了重复的分割样本验证:将数据分为衍生样本和验证样本。使用派生样本估算预测模型,并使用许多性能指标(例如,验证样本中接收器工作特性(ROC)曲线下方的面积)评估所得模型的预测准确性。重复此过程1,000次-将初始数据集分为衍生样本和验证样本1,000次,并对每个方法的每种方法的预测准确性进行评估。 1000个衍生样本中的回归树模型的平均ROC曲线面积为.928,而逻辑回归模型的平均ROC曲线面积为.924。我们的研究表明,逻辑回归模型和回归树的性能可与更灵活的数据驱动模型(例如GAM和MARS)相媲美。鉴于这些模型具有出色的预测准确性,因此对于临床医生(医疗保健经理,政策制定者等)来说,这可能是有价值的决策支持工具,可以在疾病管理中做出明智的决策,最终有助于改善医院绩效管理的措施。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Decision Sciences》 |2014年第5期|849-880|共32页
  • 作者

    Eren Demir;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Marketing & Enterprise, Business Analysis and Statistics Group, Business School, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Risk of readmission; COPD; Predictive Analytics;

    机译:再入院的风险;COPD;预测分析;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号