首页> 外文会议>Frontiers in Education, 2002. FIE 2002. 32nd Annual >Humbleness as a practical vehicle for engineering ethics education
【24h】

Humbleness as a practical vehicle for engineering ethics education

机译:谦虚是工程道德教育的实践工具

获取原文

摘要

Summary form only given. This paper, representing a work-in-progress, proposes the practice of humbleness as a practical vehicle for training students in engineering ethics. To help understand the relationship between humbleness and engineering ethics, this paper adopts a two-fold approach. First, it focuses on the antithesis of humbleness, namely arrogance, and argues that whenever the occurrence of an engineering disaster in the real world had been traced, following investigation, to unethical decision making, arrogance had invariably emerged as the root cause of the problem. Second, in sharp contrast to arrogance, humbleness is defined as unpretentious, freedom from conceit and vanity, and placing a moderate estimate on one's own abilities or worth. Thus, humbleness is likely to refine, sharpen, and broaden one's thinking, keep one's mind clear and open to the unlimited possibilities in nature, contain selfishness, and prepare one for ethical decision making in real-world situations. Under this work-in-progress, an experiment has been under way between 1999 and the present, spanning Arizona State University and Stevens Institute of Technology, focused on analyzing the practice of humbleness and its impact on a specific attribute of ethical decision making, in engineering design teams. Students working in teams are instructed to extend measured trust to their peers, subject to verification, and listen to their ideas with genuine respect and constructive criticism, as a practical manifestation of humbleness. Preliminary data indicates that the groups' decisions are highly constructive, synergistic, and positive, leading to successful projects that are highly beneficial to society and potentially patentable.
机译:仅提供摘要表格。本文代表了一个进行中的工作,提出了谦卑的作法,以此作为培训学生进行工程伦理学的实用工具。为了帮助理解谦卑与工程道德之间的关系,本文采用了两种方法。首先,它着重于谦虚的对立面,即傲慢,并指出,只要经过调查发现,在现实世界中发生了工程灾难,是出于不道德的决策,则傲慢总是作为问题的根本原因而出现。 。其次,与傲慢形成鲜明对比的是,谦卑被定义为谦逊,无自负和虚荣,并对自己的能力或价值进行适度的估计。因此,谦虚很可能会改善,加强和拓宽人的思想,保持头脑清晰,对自然界中无限的可能性持开放态度,包容自私,并为现实世界中的道德决策做准备。在这项正在进行的工作中,自1999年至今,亚利桑那州立大学和史蒂文斯理工学院一直在进行一项实验,着重分析谦卑的作法及其对道德决策的特定属性的影响。工程设计团队。指导团队合作的学生将同等的信任扩展到他们的同龄人,接受验证,并以真诚的尊重和建设性的批评倾听他们的想法,这是谦卑的实际体现。初步数据表明,这些小组的决策具有高度建设性,协同作用和积极性,从而导致成功的项目对社会非常有利,并且有可能获得专利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号