首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems >Can We Get Better Assessment from a Tutoring System Compared to Traditional Paper Testing? Can We Have Our Cake (Better Assessment) and Eat It too (Student Learning during the Test)?
【24h】

Can We Get Better Assessment from a Tutoring System Compared to Traditional Paper Testing? Can We Have Our Cake (Better Assessment) and Eat It too (Student Learning during the Test)?

机译:与传统纸质测试相比,我们可以从辅导系统中获得更好的评估吗?我们可以拥有我们的蛋糕(更好的评估)吗?也可以吃它(在测试期间学习)?

获取原文

摘要

Dynamic assessment (DA) has been advocated as an interactive approach to conducting assessments to students in the learning systems. Sternberg and others proposed to give students tests to see how much assistance it takes a student to learn a topic; and to use as a measure of their learning gain. To researchers in the ITS community, it comes as no surprise that measuring how much assistance a student needs to complete a task successfully is probably a good indicator of this lack of knowledge. However, a cautionary note is that conducting DA takes more time than simply administering regular test items to students. In this paper, we report a study analyzing 40-minutes data of totally 1,392 students from two school years. The result suggests that for the purpose of assessing student performance, it is more efficient for students to take DA than just having practice items.
机译:动态评估(DA)已被提倡作为对学习系统中学生进行评估的互动方法。斯特恩伯格和其他人建议给学生测试,看看它需要学生学习主题的多少援助;并用作他们学习收益的衡量标准。对于其社区的研究人员来说,它毫不奇怪地衡量学生需要成功完成任务的多少援助可能是这种缺乏知识的良好指标。然而,警示注意事项是,执行DA需要更多的时间,而只是简单地向学生管理常规测试项目。在本文中,我们报告了一项研究分析了两所学校的40分钟学生40分钟的数据。结果表明,为了评估学生绩效,对于学生来说比练习物品更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号