首页> 外文会议>International conference on intelligent tutoring systems;ITS 2010 >Can We Get Better Assessment from a Tutoring System Compared to Traditional Paper Testing? Can We Have Our Cake (Better Assessment) and Eat It too (Student Learning during the Test)?
【24h】

Can We Get Better Assessment from a Tutoring System Compared to Traditional Paper Testing? Can We Have Our Cake (Better Assessment) and Eat It too (Student Learning during the Test)?

机译:与传统的纸质考试相比,我们可以从辅导系统获得更好的评估吗?我们可以吃蛋糕(更好的评估),也可以吃蛋糕(测试期间的学生学习)吗?

获取原文

摘要

Dynamic assessment (DA) has been advocated as an interactive approach to conducting assessments to students in the learning systems. Steinberg and others proposed to give students tests to see how much assistance it takes a student to learn a topic; and to use as a measure of their learning gain. To researchers in the ITS community, it comes as no surprise that measuring how much assistance a student needs to complete a task successfully is probably a good indicator of this lack of knowledge. However, a cautionary note is that conducting DA takes more time than simply administering regular test items to students. In this paper, we report a study analyzing 40-minutes data of totally 1,392 students from two school years. The result suggests that for the purpose of assessing student performance, it is more efficient for students to take DA than just having practice items.
机译:动态评估(DA)已被提倡为一种交互式方法,用于对学习系统中的学生进行评估。斯坦伯格和其他人提议给学生做测试,以了解学生学习一个主题需要多少帮助。并以此来衡量他们的学习收益。对于ITS社区的研究人员而言,毫不奇怪的是,衡量学生成功完成一项任务所需的帮助量可能是缺乏知识的一个很好的指标。但是,需要注意的是,进行DA所花的时间比简单地向学生管理常规考试项目要花费更多的时间。在本文中,我们报告了一项研究,该研究分析了两个学年中总共1,392名学生的40分钟数据。结果表明,出于评估学生表现的目的,学生获得DA的效率比仅拥有练习项目的效率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号