【24h】

Effective Peer Reviews: Role in Quality

机译:有效的同行评审:质量中的角色

获取原文

摘要

The utility of reviews, specifically of artifacts related to software development cannot be overemphasized. However, adopting a consistent and fruitful review process is difficult. There are many challenges to streamlining a review process to be widely accepted and followed in a software development team. In this paper, we look at the learning gleaned from trying to adopt a consistent, constructive and effective review process across multiple teams. We look at the pitfalls, travails, shortcomings and mistakes while adopting a review process across various stages of the development process. We also highlight things that actually help a review process to be a "baked in" part of development process rather than being a "bolted on". This paper is primarily based on the authors' first hand experiences on introducing, sustaining and benefitting from peer reviews in software development. The paper presents a holistic view of review rather than focusing on just code reviews. Review of other artifacts like designs, plans, and schedules shall also be discussed. It will be useful to managers and development team members in leadership roles. The paper provides insight from practical and firsthand experience about one of the important aspects of a software development process.
机译:评论的效用,尤其是与软件开发相关的工件的评论,不能被过分强调。但是,采用一致且卓有成效的审查流程很困难。在软件开发团队中,简化审核流程以使其广泛接受和遵循存在许多挑战。在本文中,我们着眼于尝试在多个团队中采用一致,建设性和有效的审查流程而获得的学习成果。我们在开发过程的各个阶段采用审查过程时,会着眼于缺陷,困扰,缺点和错误。我们还将重点介绍实际上有助于使审核过程成为开发过程的“基础”部分,而不是“强化”的部分。本文主要基于作者在介绍,维持和受益于软件开发中同行评审方面的第一手经验。本文提出了一种整体的审查观点,而不是仅仅关注代码审查。还应讨论对其他工件(如设计,计划和进度表)的审查。这对于担任领导职务的经理和开发团队成员将很有用。本文提供了从实践和第一手经验中获得的关于软件开发过程重要方面之一的见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号