首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology and High Density Packaging >Comparative analysis of reliability between dual-row and conventional QFN packages
【24h】

Comparative analysis of reliability between dual-row and conventional QFN packages

机译:双排与QFN包装之间可靠性的比较分析

获取原文

摘要

The reliability of novel Quad Flat No-Lead (QFN) package design with multi-row lead fingers has not been well analyzed yet. The thermal characterization, warpage performance and board level solder joint reliability of dual-row and conventional QFN packages are investigated in this paper for comparison. Flotherm Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) software is employed to predict the package thermal performance. Warpage performance is studied by FE modeling, and correlates with analytical results from Timoshenko's bi-layer beam model. In board level solder joint reliability comparison study, 3D-Quarter finite element (FE) model, steady-state creep hyperbolic sine constitutive model for SnAgCu solder and Zhu's energy based fatigue model are used. The results show that thermal performance and board level solder joint fatigue life of conventional QFN are slightly greater than that of dual-row QFN. Warpage results based on bi-layer beam theory basically agree with FE modeling results.
机译:新型四扁平无铅(QFN)包装设计的可靠性尚未得到很好的分析。 本文研究了双排和传统QFN封装的热表征,翘曲性能和板级焊接可靠性,以进行比较。 Flotherm计算流体动力学(CFD)软件用于预测包装热性能。 通过FE建模研究了翘曲性能,与Timoshenko的双层梁模型的分析结果相关。 在船上焊接联合可靠性比较研究中,使用了3D季度有限元(FE)模型,使用Snagcu焊接和朱的能量疲劳模型的稳态蠕动双曲正弦集体模型。 结果表明,传统QFN的热性能和板级焊料疲劳寿命略大于双排QFN。 基于双层光束理论的翘曲结果基本上与FE建模结果一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号