首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology >PROPER UNDERSTANDING OF RELEVANT ARTICLES IN RCC-MAND PANE G-7-002
【24h】

PROPER UNDERSTANDING OF RELEVANT ARTICLES IN RCC-MAND PANE G-7-002

机译:对RCC-MAND潘尼G-7-002中相关文章的正确理解

获取原文

摘要

The French code, "Design and construction rules for mechanical components of PWR nuclear island" RCC-Mand the Russian code "Regulations for strength analysis of equipment and pipelines of atomic power plants" PANEG-7-002, both for nuke plant design, are sometimes used in China, and discrepancies in understanding somearticles of such foreign design codes will some times give different conclusions as "acceptable" or "unacceptable"the concerned material or product. Section IV of RCC-M concerns with qualification and performance of weldingoperations. Article S 3150 in this section covers the retesting procedures and article S 3152 in it relates todestructive tests. One sentence in Article S 3152 reads like this, "Where an unsatisfactory result is due to the poorexecution of the test or the presence of a defect in the specimen, the relevant result must be discarded and the testshall be repeated." The "presence of a defect" arose discrepancies in understanding the sentence because there isno definition in RCC-M to clarify their scopes such as how big a defect should be considered as a "defect" that caninvalidate the test results. Section 5.5 of PANE G-7-002 concerns the determination of critical brittle temperature.It stipulates that critical brittle temperature TK is a temperature at which the impact strength values must be higherthan the specified ones. The specified criterion values of impact strength are related to the yield strength but it isnot quite definite that the yield strength values in the table should be the documented minimum values fordifferent materials or that they should be the tested results of the concerned lots of materials the specimenrepresents. The two different understandings of the yield strength values will sometimes give contraryconclusions. This paper introduces the different opinions in understanding the code texts, makes clear what itsupports, and states in detail the reasons it so believes.
机译:法国法规“压水堆核岛机械部件的设计和建造规则” RCC-M 以及俄罗斯法规“原子能发电厂设备和管道强度分析的规定” G-7-002,既用于核武器工厂设计,有时在中国使用,并且在理解某些方面存在差异 此类国外设计规范的条款有时会得出不同的结论,即“可接受”或“不可接受” 有关的材料或产品。 RCC-M的第IV节涉及焊接的资格和性能 操作。本节中的S 3150条涵盖了重新测试程序,其中涉及的S 3152条与 破坏性测试。 S 3152条中的一句话如下: 执行测试或样品中存在缺陷时,必须丢弃相关结果并进行测试 应当重复。”“存在缺陷”在理解句子时出现了差异,因为存在 RCC-M中没有定义来澄清其范围,例如应将多大的缺陷视为可以 使测试结果无效。 PANE G-7-002的第5.5节涉及临界脆性温度的确定。 它规定了脆性临界温度TK是必须提高冲击强度值的温度 比指定的要多。规定的冲击强度标准值与屈服强度有关,但它是 并不确定表中的屈服强度值应为所记录的最小值 不同的材料,或者它们应该是所涉及的许多材料的测试结果的样本 代表。对屈服强度值的两种不同理解有时会给出相反的结论 结论。本文介绍了在理解代码文本方面的不同见解,明确了它的含义。 支持并详细说明其认为的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号