首页> 外文会议>Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management (ISCRAM), 2011 International Conference on >How to protect brand relationship quality in corporate crisis by appropriate communication strategy?—Moderating effect of consumer psychological contract
【24h】

How to protect brand relationship quality in corporate crisis by appropriate communication strategy?—Moderating effect of consumer psychological contract

机译:如何通过适当的沟通策略来保护企业危机中的品牌关系质量?-消费者心理契约的调节作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Many factors affect brand relationship quality in corporate crisis, crisis communication strategy (CCS) for example. Different communication strategies may generate different impacts on consumers. However we can't ignore other factors that influence communication effects, such as consumer types. This paper uses consumer psychological contract (CPC) to distinguish the types of consumers and brand relationship quality (BRQ) to quantify crisis communication effects. We conducted a scenario-based experiment using beverage as stimulus and divided crisis communication strategies into three: apology, defense and compensation. The result showed that compensation is a better crisis communication strategy when consumer psychological contract is transactional;Communication strategies make no difference when consumer psychological contract is relational. CPC is identified as a moderator between the CCS and BRQ.
机译:许多因素会影响企业危机中的品牌关系质量,例如危机沟通策略(CCS)。不同的沟通策略可能会对消费者产生不同的影响。但是,我们不能忽略其他影响沟通效果的因素,例如消费者类型。本文使用消费者心理契约(CPC)来区分消费者的类型和品牌关系质量(BRQ)来量化危机传播效果。我们使用饮料作为刺激进行了基于情景的实验,并将危机沟通策略分为三种:道歉,辩护和补偿。结果表明,在消费者心理契约为交易性的情况下,补偿是较好的危机沟通策略;在消费者心理契约为关系性的情况下,沟通策略没有区别。 CPC被确定为CCS和BRQ之间的主持人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号