首页> 外文会议>Conference on modeling, systems engineering, and project management for astronomy >The Tail Wags the Dog: Managing Large Telescope Construction Projects with Lagging Requirements and Creeping Scope
【24h】

The Tail Wags the Dog: Managing Large Telescope Construction Projects with Lagging Requirements and Creeping Scope

机译:尾巴摇狗:管理大型望远镜建设项目,要求落后,爬行范围大

获取原文

摘要

In a perfect world, large telescopes would be developed and built in logical, sequential order. First, scientific requirements would be agreed upon, vetted, and fully developed. From these, instrument designers would define their own subsystem requirements and specifications, and then flesh out preliminary designs. This in turn would then allow optic designers to specify lens and mirror requirements, which would permit telescope mounts and drives to be designed. Finally, software and safety systems, enclosures and domes, buildings, foundations, and infrastructures would be specified and developed. Unfortunately, the order of most large telescope projects is the opposite of this sequence. We don't live in a perfect world. Scientists usually don't want to commit to operational requirements until late in the design process, instrument designers frequently change and update their designs due to improving filter and camera technologies, and mount and optics engineers seem to live by the words 'more' and 'better' throughout their own design processes. Amplifying this is the fact that site construction of buildings and domes are usually the earliest critical path items on the schedule, and are often subject to lengthy permitting and environmental processes. These facility and support items therefore must quickly get underway, often before operational requirements are fully considered. Mirrors and mounts also have very long lead times for fabrication, which in turn necessitates that they are specified and purchased early. All of these factors can result in expensive and time-consuming change orders when requirements are finalized and/or shift late in the process. This paper discusses some of these issues encountered on large, multi-year construction projects. It also presents some techniques and ideas to minimize these effects on schedule and cost. Included is a discussion on the role of Interface Control Documents (ICDs), the importance (and danger) of making big-picture decisions early, and designing flexibility and adaptability into subsystems. In a perfect world, science would be the big dog in the room, wagging the engineering tail. In our non-perfect world, however, it's often the tail that ends up wagging the dog instead.
机译:在理想的世界中,大型望远镜将按逻辑顺序进行开发和建造。首先,科学要求将被商定,审查和充分发展。由此,仪器设计人员将定义自己的子系统要求和规格,然后充实初步设计。这样一来,光学设计人员便可以指定透镜和反射镜的要求,从而可以设计望远镜的底座和驱动器。最后,将指定和开发软件和安全系统,外壳和圆顶,建筑物,地基和基础设施。不幸的是,大多数大型望远镜项目的顺序与此顺序相反。我们没有生活在一个完美的世界中。科学家通常只希望在设计过程的后期才满足操作要求,由于改进了滤镜和摄像头技术,仪器设计人员经常更改和更新他们的设计,并且安装和光学工程师似乎都喜欢“更多”和“在自己的设计过程中更好”。事实是,建筑物和穹顶的场地建设通常是时间表上最早的关键路径项目,而且常常要经过漫长的许可和环境过程。因此,通常必须在充分考虑运营要求之前,迅速开展这些设施和支持项目。反光镜和安装座的交货时间也很长,因此必须尽早确定和购买。当需求最终确定和/或在流程后期转移时,所有这些因素都可能导致昂贵且耗时的变更单。本文讨论了在大型,多年期建设项目中遇到的一些问题。它还提出了一些技术和思想,以最大程度地减少对进度和成本的影响。其中包括有关接口控制文档(ICD)的作用,及早做出大决策的重要性以及对子系统设计灵活性和适应性的重要性(和危险)的讨论。在一个完美的世界中,科学将是房间里的大狗,摇晃工程的尾巴。但是,在我们这个不完美的世界中,通常是尾巴最终摇着狗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号