首页> 外文会议>ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work >Searching for the Goldilocks Zone: Trade-Offs in Manaaina Online Volunteer Groups
【24h】

Searching for the Goldilocks Zone: Trade-Offs in Manaaina Online Volunteer Groups

机译:搜索Goldilocks区域:Manaaina在线志愿者小组的权衡取舍

获取原文

摘要

Dedicated and productive members who actively contribute to community efforts are crucial to the success of online volunteer groups such as Wikipedia. What predicts member productivity? Do productive members stay longer? How does involvement in multiple projects affect member contribution to the community? In this paper, we analyze data from 648 WikiProjecls lo address these questions. Our results reveal two critical trade-offs in managing online volunteer groups. First, factors thai increase member productivity, measured by the number of edits on Wikipedia articles, also increase likelihood of withdrawal from contributing, perhaps due to feelings of 'mission accomplished' or 'burnout'. Second, individual membership in multiple projects has mixed effects. It decreases the amount of work editors contribute to both the individual projects and Wikipedia as a whole. It increases withdrawal for each individual project yet reduces withdrawal from Wikipedia. We discuss how our findings expand existing theories to fit the online context and inform the design of new tools to improve online volunteer work.
机译:积极贡献于社区努力的敬业和富有成效的成员对于诸如Wikipedia之类的在线志愿者团体的成功至关重要。什么能预测会员的生产力?生产成员会停留更长的时间吗?参与多个项目如何影响成员对社区的贡献?在本文中,我们分析了来自648个WikiProjecls的数据,以解决这些问题。我们的结果揭示了在管理在线志愿者团体方面的两个关键权衡。首先,根据Wikipedia文章上的编辑次数来衡量的提高成员生产率的因素,也可能增加了退出贡献的可能性,这可能是由于“任务完成”或“倦怠”的感觉。其次,多个项目中的个人成员资格具有不同的效果。这减少了编辑人员为单个项目和整个Wikipedia做出贡献的工作量。它增加了每个项目的退出率,但减少了从Wikipedia退出的可能性。我们讨论了我们的发现如何扩展现有理论以适合在线环境并为新工具的设计提供信息,以改善在线志愿者的工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号