首页> 外文会议>The 21st IASTED international multi-conference on applied informatics >A COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT JAVA TECHNOLOGIES TO IMPLEMENT A MOBILE AGENT SYSTEM
【24h】

A COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT JAVA TECHNOLOGIES TO IMPLEMENT A MOBILE AGENT SYSTEM

机译:实现移动代理系统的两种不同Java技术的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper describes an evaluation of the two technologies Agletsrnfrom IBM Japan and JavaSpaces from Sun Microsystems used tornimplement the same mobile agent system. The Aglets frameworkrnwas initially designed to support mobile agents, while the JavaSpacesrnframework was not. In this evaluation we have looked at issues likernadaptability, configurability, extensibility, location transparency, andrnabstraction level. We have also measured the effort that was used (inrnhours) and the lines of code necessary to implement the same mobilernagent system using the two different technologies. We found thatrnthere are several advantages by using JavaSpaces instead of Agletsrnfor implementing mobile agent systems even if it was not intentionallyrndesigned to support this. Our evaluation does not look at therndifference in performance of the two technologies.
机译:本文描述了对IBM Japan的Agletsrn和Sun Microsystems的JavaSpaces两种技术的评估,这些技术用于实现同一移动代理系统。 Aglets框架最初是为了支持移动代理而设计的,而JavaSpacesrnframework不是。在此评估中,我们研究了诸如适应性,可配置性,可扩展性,位置透明性和抽象性等问题。我们还测量了使用两种不同技术实现同一移动代理系统所需的工作量(小时)和所需的代码行。我们发现使用JavaSpaces代替Agletsrn实现移动代理系统有很多优点,即使它不是故意设计来支持它的。我们的评估没有考虑这两种技术的性能差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号